\documentclass{chowto} \title{Design of the SOS Lucite Detector} \howtotype{reference} \author{Liguang Tang} \category{sos} \date{June 10, 2003} \begin{document} \begin{abstract} This Howto outlines the purpose of the SOS Lucite detector and its design parameters. General information on mechanical installation and electronics setup are also given. \end{abstract} \section{Purpose} This detector was designed and used as part of the particle identification to suppress protons from lighter particles, kaons and pions. It is a total internal reflection type of detector. The Lucite material (C(CH$_3$)CO$_2$CH$_3$ polymer) has an index of refraction n = 1.49, so that the threshold $\beta$ for Lucite \v{C}erenkov radiation is 0.672. The outside medium is air with an index of about 1. In such case, the total internal reflection takes place when the incident radiation angle is larger than the so called critical angle which is defined by: sin($\theta_{\rm critical}$) = 1/n, about 42.16 degrees. Therefore, there is a threshold $\beta$ beyond which the total internal reflection will take place and the \v{C}erenkov radiation will in principle remain transmitting inside of the Lucite to the ends, where PMTs are attached. This threshold can be found by $\beta_{\rm TIR} \ge 1/\sqrt{n^-1}$, corresponding to threshold at $\beta$ = 0.905. In general with normal incident, with a momentum above 1.06 GeV/c radiations from kaons will be collectable through TIR. On the other hand, protons need to have a momentum above 2.0 GeV/c in order to have collectable TIR radiation. Thus, proton rejection can be done by Lucite \v{C}erenkov detector up to the maximum SOS momentum, while the minimum momentum for the desired lighter particles depends on the mass of such particle, as an example of kaons mentioned above. \section{Design and Installation} \v{C}erenkov radiation has a continuous energy spectrum, with a stronger intensity in the short wavelength, in the ultra-violet region. In order to minimize the scattering and absorption loss, UV transmitting Lucite material was used for the SOS Lucite detector. The detector consists of eight horizontal Lucite bars, each one has a thickness of 2.54 cm and an active area of 40 x 13.7 cm$^2$. Tapper light guide with the same material reduced the cross section over a 15 cm length to fit a 3 in Phillip PMT mounted at each end. Each bar was individually wrapped by black Teflon foil to seal outside light and absorb the escaped none - TIR radiation. The eight bars were mounted on a common holding frame. This frame was then attached to the supporting frame that holds the S2Y and S2X scintillators, in front of the S2Y. Thus, this detector is ahead of S2Y. \section{Electronics setup} There were total of 16 analog signals sent to upstairs counting house patch panel. Due to the low gain of PMTs and attenuation in long transmission, the signals are small for split. Thus, the signals were first sent to a 10 times linear amplifier. Then it was splitted: 2/3 went to ADC and 1/3 to the 16-channels CAMAC discriminator that can provide a sum output signal. The PMT HVs were adjusted by single photo-electron peak. A common threshold was used for the discriminator module. Single output from the sum was used in the PID trigger system. If this signal is sent further to another discriminator, by changing the threshold level one can select requirement of signal from one-PMT, or two-PMTs, or so on. Due to variation of incident angles, only one-PMT requirement was commonly used. \section{Performance} This detector was mainly used in the kaon experiments in the past with SOS as the kaon arm. It was found that with the above mentioned electronics setup, background protons in trigger were reduced by a factor of 3. More detailed analysis in the offline can reduce it further. However, the angular spread of the incident particles was sufficiently large to cause certain level of overlap for the summed ADCs bwteen those from protons and kaons. Thus, to maintain no more than 2 % kaon loss, small per centage of protons remained in the data and were further rejected by other mean, such as TOF. \end{document} % Revision history: % $Log: SOS_Lucite.tex,v $ % Revision 1.2 2003/06/19 18:26:58 saw % Minor cleanup % % Revision 1.1 2003/06/12 16:15:47 saw % Initial Checkin %