These are the links for the beam energy and various kinematic offsets:

1. Preliminary beam energy measurements (by Mark Jones): 4.2 GeV, 5.2 GeV, 3.8 GeV, 4.7 GeV
The energy measurements are called preliminary because the superharp information has not yet been incorporated.

2. Beam Position Information: new 10/1/03

i.Vertical spot position at each energy (by Chuncheng Xu)
ii. BPM z-positions, Superharp z-positions

3. Preliminary e+p offset determinations:

i. offline analysis of single arm measurements (by Tanja Horn) FpiII HMS runs
FpiII HMS runs (obsolete)   additional residual plots
The effects of radiation, vertical beam position, and the W vs xpfp correlation have been taken into account. There are systematic problems at small HMS angles (ie, where we take all our production data!).

Tanja's on-line single arm measurements (obsolete) 4.2 GeV, 5.2 GeV, 3.8 GeV, 4.7 GeV

ii. coincidence measurements (aka HEEPCHECK)
Not-so-Preliminary HEEPcheck analysis (by Chuncheng Xu) updated 10/10/03 with vertical beam position corrections on xptar and delta
To do: update the residual plots to be consistent with the new beam position corrections, check the energy loss corrections, assign reasonable errors for dW, etc (in progress), and finally do a global fit.
Preliminary PmOOP analysis (by Chuncheng Xu) obsolete
List of HEEPcheck runs (by Chuncheng Xu)
Plot showing radiative tails of heepcheck variables

4. SOS Saturation Information (by Dave Mack)
Using the code from the engine's central field correction for the SOS, I made a plot for comparison to Figure 4.7 of Jochen's thesis. The agreement is good though that doesn't make it correct. If the saturation correction is enabled and SOS momentum offsets are determined, at least we'll have some hope of understanding what it means.
Plot of SOS saturation correction in engine as of September 9, 2003
Data for SOS saturation correction plot

5. standard.kinematics

Aug 28, 2003, by Dave Mack