Parallel: | |
![]() |
![]() |
Perpendicular: | |
![]() |
![]() |
Below are some plots for a two dimensional fit. The perpendicular results appear to have a stronger theta dependence.
Parallel: | |
![]() |
![]() |
Perpendicular: | |
![]() |
![]() |
Below are the 2D fit results
Parallel: | |
![]() |
![]() |
Perpendicular: | |
![]() |
![]() |
Below are the asymmetry results from selecting events with a cherenkov double track hit (ADC > 2) only. These events come only from pairs produced in the tracker.
If we trust the background correction above, then the low x data still could use improvements. Possible sources of low x problems could be
![]() | Name | Last modified | Size | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Parent Directory | - | ||
![]() | A180A80_47_bg_fit_40..> | 2015-01-09 17:56 | 53K | |
![]() | A180A80_59_bg_fit_40..> | 2015-01-09 17:56 | 62K | |
![]() | fit_simulation_ratio..> | 2015-01-09 17:56 | 13K | |
![]() | fit_simulation_ratio..> | 2015-01-09 17:56 | 14K | |
![]() | fit_simulation_ratio..> | 2015-01-09 17:56 | 13K | |
![]() | fit_simulation_ratio..> | 2015-01-09 17:56 | 14K | |
![]() | twodim_background_pa..> | 2015-01-09 17:56 | 30K | |
![]() | twodim_background_pa..> | 2015-01-09 17:56 | 39K | |
![]() | twodim_background_pa..> | 2015-01-09 17:56 | 30K | |
![]() | twodim_background_pa..> | 2015-01-09 17:56 | 39K | |
![]() | twodim_background_pe..> | 2015-01-09 17:56 | 32K | |
![]() | twodim_background_pe..> | 2015-01-09 17:56 | 39K | |
![]() | twodim_background_pe..> | 2015-01-09 17:56 | 32K | |
![]() | twodim_background_pe..> | 2015-01-09 17:56 | 39K | |