Main INDEX
Monthly INDEX
PREV
NEXT
User name I. Shin
Log entry time 10:10:10 on January 22,1999
Entry number 258
keyword=Yields for LH2 pi+.
Here are the yields for parellel settings of LH2 runs. For Q^2=0.6, high epsilon,
the magnetude of yields are very different from Kelley's result but the behavior
of change through run by run is in the same way.
For Q^2=0.6, epsilon=0.74, theta_piq=-2.77 in FIGURE 1, run 17023 terminated
abnormally due to a blown fuse in VMEC5 crate. So I removed it. And run 17029
has something screwed up in the calculation of the accumulated charge.
The following is from gen17029.txt.
Q_tot(microCoulombs) BCM1: -28350 BCM2: 40629 BCM3: 45022
I_avg Q_tot Q_tot
(microAmps) (microCoulombs) (microAmp-hours)
BCM1 -12.698 -28350.131 -7.875
BCM2 18.197 40628.674 11.286
BCM3 20.165 45022.124 12.506
***********
* Beam On *
***********
Threshold = 5.0
Beam on time = 1735.92 sec ( 77.8 % )
I_avg Q_tot Q_tot
(microAmps) (microCoulombs) (microAmp-hours)
bocur 40.836 70888.035 19.691
Q_tot of BCM2(40628.674) is grepped in efficiency table but it is quite different
from the beam on current Q_tot(70888.035). I made a plot with beam on current
Q_tot value only for run 17029 but Q_tot of BCM2 values are used for the other runs.
This correction make run 17029 consist with other theta_piq=-2.77 setting runs.
Jochen already studied for for the parallel settings of Q2=1.6. see entry 230.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4