• Main INDEX
  • Monthly INDEX
  • PREV
  • NEXT

    User name I. Shin

    Log entry time 10:10:10 on January 22,1999

    Entry number 258

    keyword=Yields for LH2 pi+.

    Here are the yields for parellel settings of LH2 runs. For Q^2=0.6, high epsilon,
    the magnetude of yields are very different from Kelley's result but the behavior
    of change through run by run is in the same way.
    For Q^2=0.6, epsilon=0.74, theta_piq=-2.77 in FIGURE 1, run 17023 terminated
    abnormally due to a blown fuse in VMEC5 crate. So I removed it. And run 17029
    has something screwed up in the calculation of the accumulated charge.
    The following is from gen17029.txt.

      Q_tot(microCoulombs) BCM1:  -28350  BCM2:   40629  BCM3:   45022
     
              I_avg           Q_tot             Q_tot
            (microAmps)   (microCoulombs)   (microAmp-hours)
      BCM1    -12.698        -28350.131          -7.875
      BCM2     18.197         40628.674          11.286
      BCM3     20.165         45022.124          12.506
     
      ***********
      * Beam On *
      ***********
      Threshold       =     5.0
      Beam on time    =  1735.92 sec        (  77.8 % )
               I_avg           Q_tot             Q_tot
            (microAmps)   (microCoulombs)   (microAmp-hours)
      bocur     40.836         70888.035          19.691
     
    
    Q_tot of BCM2(40628.674) is grepped in efficiency table but it is quite different
    from the beam on current Q_tot(70888.035). I made a plot with beam on current
    Q_tot value only for run 17029 but Q_tot of BCM2 values are used for the other runs.
    This correction make run 17029 consist with other theta_piq=-2.77 setting runs.

    Jochen already studied for for the parallel settings of Q2=1.6. see entry 230.



    FIGURE 1


    FIGURE 2


    FIGURE 3
    FIGURE 4