Difference between revisions of "Edet: Important summary/conclusions"

From PolWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: '''Important pointers or conclusions with reference to the respective ELOG''' {| border="1" align="center" |+ ! scope="col" width="15%" |Category !! scope="col" width="8%" |Date !! sc...)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
|[https://qweak.jlab.org/elog/DAQ+%26+Analysis/291 ELOG291]
 
|[https://qweak.jlab.org/elog/DAQ+%26+Analysis/291 ELOG291]
 
|Reproduces the behaviour of data with and without explicit noise subtraction
 
|Reproduces the behaviour of data with and without explicit noise subtraction
 +
|-
 +
|Deadtime
 +
|7 May '14
 +
|Deadtime correction reproduces GEANT pol%
 +
|[https://qweak.jlab.org/elog/Electron+Detector/595 ELOG 595]
 +
|When GEANT3 simulated rates were taken through DAQ simulated in Modelsim, the resulting yields were not giving same pol%, applying deadtime correction fixed it
 +
|-
 +
|Rate loss
 +
|21 Feb '14
 +
|Loss in signals due to Rate explained
 +
|[https://qweak.jlab.org/elog/DAQ+%26+Analysis/298 DAQ ELOG 298]
 +
|Explains the loss in signals due to rate quantitatively showing its origin in the trigger chain.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|

Latest revision as of 20:30, 17 August 2014

Important pointers or conclusions with reference to the respective ELOG

Category Date About Reference Summary
Modelsim 5 Dec '13 Accum-Scalar discrepancy ELOG291 Reproduces the behaviour of data with and without explicit noise subtraction
Deadtime 7 May '14 Deadtime correction reproduces GEANT pol% ELOG 595 When GEANT3 simulated rates were taken through DAQ simulated in Modelsim, the resulting yields were not giving same pol%, applying deadtime correction fixed it
Rate loss 21 Feb '14 Loss in signals due to Rate explained DAQ ELOG 298 Explains the loss in signals due to rate quantitatively showing its origin in the trigger chain.