Difference between revisions of "Edet: Important summary/conclusions"
From PolWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|[https://qweak.jlab.org/elog/Electron+Detector/595 ELOG 595] | |[https://qweak.jlab.org/elog/Electron+Detector/595 ELOG 595] | ||
|When GEANT3 simulated rates were taken through DAQ simulated in Modelsim, the resulting yields were not giving same pol%, applying deadtime correction fixed it | |When GEANT3 simulated rates were taken through DAQ simulated in Modelsim, the resulting yields were not giving same pol%, applying deadtime correction fixed it | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Rate loss | ||
| + | |21 Feb '14 | ||
| + | |Loss in signals due to Rate explained | ||
| + | |[https://qweak.jlab.org/elog/DAQ+%26+Analysis/298 DAQ ELOG 298] | ||
| + | |Explains the loss in signals due to rate quantitatively showing its origin in the trigger chain. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
Latest revision as of 20:30, 17 August 2014
Important pointers or conclusions with reference to the respective ELOG
| Category | Date | About | Reference | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modelsim | 5 Dec '13 | Accum-Scalar discrepancy | ELOG291 | Reproduces the behaviour of data with and without explicit noise subtraction |
| Deadtime | 7 May '14 | Deadtime correction reproduces GEANT pol% | ELOG 595 | When GEANT3 simulated rates were taken through DAQ simulated in Modelsim, the resulting yields were not giving same pol%, applying deadtime correction fixed it |
| Rate loss | 21 Feb '14 | Loss in signals due to Rate explained | DAQ ELOG 298 | Explains the loss in signals due to rate quantitatively showing its origin in the trigger chain. |
