Electron Analysis

From PolWiki
Revision as of 17:02, 25 May 2011 by Ddutta (talk | contribs) (New page: Preliminary list of analysis tasks ---------------------------------- 1. Singles data: a) examine normalized rate vs runlet for stability (strip by strip) b) verify consistency between ...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Preliminary list of analysis tasks



1. Singles data: a) examine normalized rate vs runlet for stability (strip by strip) b) verify consistency between 1/3, 2/3 and 3/3 trigger (first for beam OFF runs) c) repeat for production runs


2. Event mode data: a) stability of normalized rates vs runlet (strip by strips) b) normalized tracking rates and multiplicity vs runlets c) use 2/3 and 3/3 to examine strip efficiency d) use strip efficiency to verify consistency between 1/3, 2/3 and 3/3 triggers e) efficiency weighted rates f) efficiency weighted rates vs Compton cross-section g) automated Compton edge finder h) use tracking to confirm offsets between planes i) Check stability of offsets

3. Accum mode data: a) stability of normalized rates vs runlet (strip by strip) b) efficiency weighted rates, compared to Compton cross section c) asymmetry vs runlet (strip by strip) d) asymmetry vs actual displacement of the electron (Compton edge position) e) consistency between 1/3, 2/3 and 3/3 trigger types f) polarization vs runlet g) consistency between different methods of extacting polarization i) Compton edge by eye, pol as the single parameter ii) Automated Compton edge and pol as single parameter iii) use both edge and zero crossing to determine polarization iv) compare differential method with the integral method


4. Verify consistency between Fortran and C++ analyzers for most of these items.