Compton Meeting, May 14, 2013 (L210A)

From PolWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
1. Dial Toll-Free Number: 866-740-1260 (U.S. & Canada)
2. International participants dial:
Toll Number: 303-248-0285=
Or International Toll-Free Number: http://www.readytalk.com/intl
3. Enter your 7-digit access code, followed by “#”

 --> our access code is 3227471

Agenda

Usual meeting room (L210A).

Miscellaneous

  • Nothing.

Laser

  • Schedule for laser table work (Mark and Dave).

Photon Detector

  • Look at backgrounds via scalers - correlate with extracted asymmetries.
    • Not yet, plan to do it along with a replay to save time (jc2).
  • Follow up from last week:
    • Few events that deposited more energy than the incident photon [1] --> any conclusions?
    • Checks using "default" GEANT routine for summing energy?

Electron detector

  • Studies including clustering trigger --> and efficiencies?
  • Efficiencies from tracking mode data (accounting for angle of electrons on detector)

Minutes

  • No objections to maintaining same meeting time over the summer.
  • Laser work in tunnel needs to be wrapped up in the next couple months. Would like to remove as much laser equipment as possible before demolition begins in the fall.
    • In addition to verifying no loss of polarization in transit to cavity what else to be done? MD and DG to consult with Kent.
  • Photon detector: N/A
  • Electron detector:
    • Elog 526 - just showing impact of different trigger cuts on energy distribution
    • Elogs 527 and 528: even with "strict" trigger, variation of polarization from plane-to-plane is on the order of 0.07%. In this context, the polarization variation of 0.15% with changing vertical edet position (0.15% for 0.2 mm) seems like no big deal.
      • EDIT: Thinking on it again - this IS a big deal. It's almost certain that we did not position the detector at the same spot with 1 strip reproducibility during the experiment.
      • Dave suggests looking at consistency between MC and analysis, i.e., there are still some "imprecise" values for c floating around. Is assumed geometry in analysis consistent with geometry used in MC?
    • VT is working on detector efficiency from tracks - accounting for the fact that electrons are not at normal incidence to detector. Nothing worth showing yet - but making progress.