Difference between revisions of "Elong-13-04-18"

From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: ==Rates Update== → For the plot below, I assume the following:<br> ::::{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1" | style="width: 200px;" |...)
 
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
:&rarr; All "Rates" in the plots below are Physics rates, not Total rates
 
:&rarr; All "Rates" in the plots below are Physics rates, not Total rates
 
:&rarr; Error bars shown are statistical only
 
:&rarr; Error bars shown are statistical only
 +
:&rarr; Still working on including the total rates -- in progress
 +
:&rarr; Below is a quick estimate of error bars -- The main update from the past week is that the code can be pushed up to x=0.98 and also working on roughly getting the error bars in at a PAC month's worth of data taking
 +
::&rarr; Still working on an exact estimate of what we can do with 30 PAC days, but it's not ready for today
 +
:&rarr; Any considerations for necessary ''x'' resolution less than what the spectrometer can give?
 +
::&rarr; Still working on the later as well, below I'm using bins of ''x'' = <''x''> &plusmn; 0.1
 +
::&rarr; In double checking the code, I'm not entirely sure of what's labeled as ''θ<sub>q</sub>'' below is actually ''θ<sub>q</sub>'' or if it's ''θ*'' -- in progress
  
[[Image:2013-04-18-rates-update.png|1200px]]
+
[[Image:2013-04-18-rates-update.png|900px]]
 +
 
 +
--[[User:Ellie|E. Long]] 15:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:27, 18 April 2013

Rates Update

→ For the plot below, I assume the following:

Target Material ND3
Target Length 3 cm
Pzz 20%
E0 11 GeV
xBjorken 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.75, 0.98
Q2 Variable
θq Calculated
θe' Calculated
E' Calculated
W Calculated
→ All "Rates" in the plots below are Physics rates, not Total rates
→ Error bars shown are statistical only
→ Still working on including the total rates -- in progress
→ Below is a quick estimate of error bars -- The main update from the past week is that the code can be pushed up to x=0.98 and also working on roughly getting the error bars in at a PAC month's worth of data taking
→ Still working on an exact estimate of what we can do with 30 PAC days, but it's not ready for today
→ Any considerations for necessary x resolution less than what the spectrometer can give?
→ Still working on the later as well, below I'm using bins of x = <x> ± 0.1
→ In double checking the code, I'm not entirely sure of what's labeled as θq below is actually θq or if it's θ* -- in progress

2013-04-18-rates-update.png

--E. Long 15:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)