Difference between revisions of "Elong-13-09-18"
From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (New page: ==Optimizing Azz in QE and x>1 Range== ===Beam Energy = 2.2 GeV=== ---- 600px 600px ===Beam Energy = 4.4 GeV=== ---...) |
|||
(24 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
− | |||
− | [[Image:2013-09-18-e022-shms. | + | ====HMS==== |
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:2013-09-18-e022-hms.gif]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====SHMS==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:2013-09-18-e022-shms.gif]] | ||
===Beam Energy = 4.4 GeV=== | ===Beam Energy = 4.4 GeV=== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
− | + | ====HMS==== | |
− | [[Image:2013-09-18-e044-shms. | + | [[Image:2013-09-18-e044-hms.gif]] |
+ | |||
+ | ====SHMS==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:2013-09-18-e044-shms.gif]] | ||
===Beam Energy = 6.6 GeV=== | ===Beam Energy = 6.6 GeV=== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
− | [[Image:2013-09-18-e066-hms. | + | ====HMS==== |
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:2013-09-18-e066-hms.gif]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====SHMS==== | ||
− | [[Image:2013-09-18-e066-shms. | + | [[Image:2013-09-18-e066-shms.gif]] |
===Beam Energy = 8.8 GeV=== | ===Beam Energy = 8.8 GeV=== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
− | [[Image:2013-09-18-e088-hms.png|600px]] | + | ====HMS==== |
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:2013-09-18-e088-hms.gif]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====SHMS==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:2013-09-18-e088-shms.gif]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Beam Energy = 11.0 GeV=== | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====HMS==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:2013-09-18-e110-hms.gif]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====SHMS==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:2013-09-18-e110-shms.gif]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Optimization Results== | ||
+ | ===Beam Energy = 2.2 GeV=== | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | [[Image:2013-09-19-e022-opt-hms.png|600px]][[Image:2013-09-19-e022-opt-shms.png|600px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Beam Energy = 4.4 GeV=== | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | [[Image:2013-09-19-e044-opt-hms.png|600px]][[Image:2013-09-19-e044-opt-shms.png|600px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Beam Energy = 6.6 GeV=== | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | [[Image:2013-09-19-e066-opt-hms.png|600px]][[Image:2013-09-19-e066-opt-shms.png|600px]] | ||
− | [[Image:2013-09- | + | ===Beam Energy = 8.8 GeV=== |
+ | ---- | ||
+ | [[Image:2013-09-19-e088-opt-hms.png|600px]][[Image:2013-09-19-e088-opt-shms.png|600px]] | ||
===Beam Energy = 11.0 GeV=== | ===Beam Energy = 11.0 GeV=== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
+ | (None for HMS -- rates drop off dramatically by the time it's in a good kinematics range) [[Image:2013-09-19-e110-opt-shms.png|600px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Fixed uncertainty due to large asymmetry== | ||
− | + | Previously, the code was using a simplified $\delta A_{zz} = \frac{4}{f \cdot Pzz \sqrt{N}}$. This gave all of the above uncertainties, as well as this one: | |
− | [[Image:2013-09- | + | [[Image:2013-09-19-old-error.png]] |
+ | Going back through [http://nuclear.unh.edu/~elong/analysis_files/2013-05-16/Azz_error.pdf the uncertainty tech note], the assumption of a small asymmetry isn't made until after Eq. 28. Utilizing the full uncertainty (Eq. 28 and 25), $\delta A_{zz} = \frac{2}{f \cdot Pzz}\sqrt{\frac{N_{Pol}}{N_u^2}+\frac{N_{Pol}^2}{N_u^3}}$, the uncertainties change (very slightly) to: | ||
− | + | [[Image:2013-09-19-new-error.png]] |
Latest revision as of 13:53, 18 October 2023
Optimizing Azz in QE and x>1 Range
Beam Energy = 2.2 GeV
HMS
SHMS
Beam Energy = 4.4 GeV
HMS
SHMS
Beam Energy = 6.6 GeV
HMS
SHMS
Beam Energy = 8.8 GeV
HMS
SHMS
Beam Energy = 11.0 GeV
HMS
SHMS
Optimization Results
Beam Energy = 2.2 GeV
Beam Energy = 4.4 GeV
Beam Energy = 6.6 GeV
Beam Energy = 8.8 GeV
Beam Energy = 11.0 GeV
(None for HMS -- rates drop off dramatically by the time it's in a good kinematics range)
Fixed uncertainty due to large asymmetry
Previously, the code was using a simplified $\delta A_{zz} = \frac{4}{f \cdot Pzz \sqrt{N}}$. This gave all of the above uncertainties, as well as this one:
Going back through the uncertainty tech note, the assumption of a small asymmetry isn't made until after Eq. 28. Utilizing the full uncertainty (Eq. 28 and 25), $\delta A_{zz} = \frac{2}{f \cdot Pzz}\sqrt{\frac{N_{Pol}}{N_u^2}+\frac{N_{Pol}^2}{N_u^3}}$, the uncertainties change (very slightly) to: