Difference between revisions of "Elong-13-09-20"
From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 8: | Line 8: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
− | Given one PAC week, using the SHMS and an 11 GeV beam on an 30% tensor polarized target, we can expect to get a good measurement from | + | Given one PAC week, using the SHMS and an 11 GeV beam on an 30% tensor polarized target, we can expect to get a good measurement from $0.8 > x > 1.8$ |
====Beam Energy = 11.0 GeV==== | ====Beam Energy = 11.0 GeV==== | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1" | ||
− | | style="width: 50px;" | | + | | style="width: 50px;" | $<x>$ || style="width: 100px;" | $dA_{zz}^{stat}$ || style="width: 100px;" | $dA_{zz}^{sys}$ |
|- | |- | ||
| 0.8 || 0.716E-02 || 0.526E-02 | | 0.8 || 0.716E-02 || 0.526E-02 | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1" | ||
− | | style="width: 50px;" | | + | | style="width: 50px;" | $<x>$ || style="width: 100px;" | $dA_{zz}^{stat}$ || style="width: 100px;" | $dA_{zz}^{sys}$ |
|- | |- | ||
| 0.8 || 0.345E-02 || 0.526E-02 | | 0.8 || 0.345E-02 || 0.526E-02 | ||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1" | ||
− | | style="width: 50px;" | | + | | style="width: 50px;" | $<x>$ || style="width: 100px;" | $dA_{zz}^{stat}$ || style="width: 100px;" | $dA_{zz}^{sys}$ |
|- | |- | ||
| 0.8 || 0.146E-02 || 0.526E-02 | | 0.8 || 0.146E-02 || 0.526E-02 | ||
Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1" | ||
− | | style="width: 50px;" | | + | | style="width: 50px;" | $<x>$ || style="width: 100px;" | $dA_{zz}^{stat}$ || style="width: 100px;" | $dA_{zz}^{sys}$ |
|- | |- | ||
| 0.8 || 0.906E-03 || 0.526E-02 | | 0.8 || 0.906E-03 || 0.526E-02 | ||
Line 180: | Line 180: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1" | ||
− | | style="width: 50px;" | | + | | style="width: 50px;" | $<x>$ || style="width: 100px;" | $dA_{zz}^{stat}$ || style="width: 100px;" | $dA_{zz}^{sys}$ |
|- | |- | ||
| 0.8 || 0.954E-03 || 0.526E-02 | | 0.8 || 0.954E-03 || 0.526E-02 |
Latest revision as of 13:54, 18 October 2023
Time Scan
Scanning over time and increasing it from 1 day to 2 weeks in intervals of one day, we get:
1 Week Measurement
Given one PAC week, using the SHMS and an 11 GeV beam on an 30% tensor polarized target, we can expect to get a good measurement from $0.8 > x > 1.8$
Beam Energy = 11.0 GeV
$<x>$ | $dA_{zz}^{stat}$ | $dA_{zz}^{sys}$ |
0.8 | 0.716E-02 | 0.526E-02 |
0.9 | 0.675E-02 | 0.120E-01 |
1.0 | 0.525E-02 | 0.249E-03 |
1.1 | 0.569E-02 | 0.307E-01 |
1.2 | 0.941E-02 | 0.667E-01 |
1.3 | 0.140E-01 | 0.924E-01 |
1.4 | 0.194E-01 | 0.998E-01 |
1.5 | 0.130E-01 | 0.100E+00 |
1.6 | 0.124E-01 | 0.100E+00 |
1.7 | 0.222E-01 | 0.100E+00 |
1.8 | 0.204E-01 | 0.100E+00 |
Spectrometer | Total Rates (kHz) | QE Physics Rates (W≤0.8) (kHz) | SRC Physics Rates (W<0.8) (kHz) |
HMS | --- | --- | --- |
SHMS | --- | --- | --- |
Beam Energy = 8.8 GeV
$<x>$ | $dA_{zz}^{stat}$ | $dA_{zz}^{sys}$ |
0.8 | 0.345E-02 | 0.526E-02 |
0.9 | 0.324E-02 | 0.120E-01 |
1.0 | 0.387E-02 | 0.249E-03 |
1.1 | 0.264E-02 | 0.307E-01 |
1.2 | 0.416E-02 | 0.667E-01 |
1.3 | 0.565E-02 | 0.924E-01 |
1.4 | 0.101E-01 | 0.998E-01 |
1.5 | 0.967E-02 | 0.100E+00 |
1.6 | 0.131E-01 | 0.100E+00 |
1.7 | 0.169E-01 | 0.100E+00 |
1.8 | 0.286E-01 | 0.100E+00 |
Spectrometer | Total Rates (kHz) | QE Physics Rates (W≤0.8) (kHz) | SRC Physics Rates (W<0.8) (kHz) |
HMS | |||
SHMS |
Beam Energy = 6.6 GeV
$<x>$ | $dA_{zz}^{stat}$ | $dA_{zz}^{sys}$ |
0.8 | 0.146E-02 | 0.526E-02 |
0.9 | 0.141E-02 | 0.120E-01 |
1.0 | 0.167E-02 | 0.249E-03 |
1.1 | 0.204E-02 | 0.307E-01 |
1.2 | 0.377E-02 | 0.667E-01 |
1.3 | 0.154E-02 | 0.924E-01 |
1.4 | 0.205E-02 | 0.998E-01 |
1.5 | 0.268E-02 | 0.100E+00 |
1.6 | 0.464E-02 | 0.100E+00 |
1.7 | 0.387E-02 | 0.100E+00 |
1.8 | 0.476E-02 | 0.100E+00 |
Spectrometer | Total Rates (kHz) | QE Physics Rates (W≤0.8) (kHz) | SRC Physics Rates (W<0.8) (kHz) |
HMS | |||
SHMS |
Beam Energy = 4.4 GeV
$<x>$ | $dA_{zz}^{stat}$ | $dA_{zz}^{sys}$ |
0.8 | 0.906E-03 | 0.526E-02 |
0.9 | 0.782E-03 | 0.120E-01 |
1.0 | 0.816E-03 | 0.249E-03 |
1.1 | 0.115E-02 | 0.307E-01 |
1.2 | 0.153E-02 | 0.667E-01 |
1.3 | 0.231E-02 | 0.924E-01 |
1.4 | 0.247E-02 | 0.998E-01 |
1.5 | 0.108E-02 | 0.100E+00 |
1.6 | 0.127E-02 | 0.100E+00 |
1.7 | 0.149E-02 | 0.100E+00 |
1.8 | 0.234E-02 | 0.100E+00 |
Spectrometer | Total Rates (kHz) | QE Physics Rates (W≤0.8) (kHz) | SRC Physics Rates (W<0.8) (kHz) |
HMS | |||
SHMS |
Beam Energy = 2.2 GeV
$<x>$ | $dA_{zz}^{stat}$ | $dA_{zz}^{sys}$ |
0.8 | 0.954E-03 | 0.526E-02 |
0.9 | 0.895E-03 | 0.120E-01 |
1.0 | 0.661E-03 | 0.249E-03 |
1.1 | 0.900E-03 | 0.307E-01 |
1.2 | 0.135E-02 | 0.667E-01 |
1.3 | 0.137E-02 | 0.924E-01 |
1.4 | 0.134E-02 | 0.998E-01 |
1.5 | 0.119E-02 | 0.100E+00 |
1.6 | 0.160E-02 | 0.100E+00 |
1.7 | 0.169E-02 | 0.100E+00 |
1.8 | 0.220E-02 | 0.100E+00 |
Spectrometer | Total Rates (kHz) | QE Physics Rates (W≤0.8) (kHz) | SRC Physics Rates (W<0.8) (kHz) |
HMS | |||
SHMS |
--E. Long 15:47, 20 September 2013 (UTC)