Difference between revisions of "Elong-13-09-24"
From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Looking at the newest Azz rates plot, that we can get those statistics from a week-long measurement almost seems too good to be true. As a check, I've compared it a bit more closely to what we did for the b1 proposal. | Looking at the newest Azz rates plot, that we can get those statistics from a week-long measurement almost seems too good to be true. As a check, I've compared it a bit more closely to what we did for the b1 proposal. | ||
| − | [[Image:2013-09-25-Azz.png]] [[Image:2013-09-25-b1-final.png]] | + | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1" |
| + | ! colspan="3" | <math>A_{zz}</math> !! !! colspan="3" | <math>b_1</math> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | colspan="3" | [[Image:2013-09-25-Azz.png|400px]] || || colspan="3" | [[Image:2013-09-25-b1-final.png|400px]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | style="width: 50px;" | <math><x></math> || style="width: 150px;" |<math>dA_{zz}^{stat} (\times 10^{-3})</math> || style="width: 150px;" | <math>dA_{zz}^{sys} (\times 10^{-3})</math> || style="width: 5px;" | || style="width: 50px;" |<math><x></math> || style="width: 150px;" | <math>dA_{zz}^{stat} (\times 10^{-3})</math> || style="width: 150px;" | <math>dA_{zz}^{sys} (\times 10^{-3})</math> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 0.8 || 4.85 || 5.26 || || 0.16 || 1.42 || 1.90 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 0.9 || 3.56 || 12.0 || || 0.28 || 2.07 || 1.98 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1.0 || 3.28 || 0.249 || || 0.36 || 2.28 || 1.95 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1.1 || 3.55 || 30.7 || || 0.49 || 2.14 || 1.96 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1.2 || 5.15 || 66.7 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1.3 || 6.29 || 92.4 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1.4 || 9.15 || 99.8 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1.5 || 11.7 || 100. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1.6 || 9.26 || 100. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1.7 || 7.98 || 100. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1.8 || 9.79 || 100. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
--[[User:Ellie|E. Long]] 21:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC) | --[[User:Ellie|E. Long]] 21:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:20, 25 September 2013
Comparing dAzz between x<0.75 and x>0.75
Looking at the newest Azz rates plot, that we can get those statistics from a week-long measurement almost seems too good to be true. As a check, I've compared it a bit more closely to what we did for the b1 proposal.
| <math>A_{zz}</math> | <math>b_1</math> | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
| |||||
| <math><x></math> | <math>dA_{zz}^{stat} (\times 10^{-3})</math> | <math>dA_{zz}^{sys} (\times 10^{-3})</math> | <math><x></math> | <math>dA_{zz}^{stat} (\times 10^{-3})</math> | <math>dA_{zz}^{sys} (\times 10^{-3})</math> | |
| 0.8 | 4.85 | 5.26 | 0.16 | 1.42 | 1.90 | |
| 0.9 | 3.56 | 12.0 | 0.28 | 2.07 | 1.98 | |
| 1.0 | 3.28 | 0.249 | 0.36 | 2.28 | 1.95 | |
| 1.1 | 3.55 | 30.7 | 0.49 | 2.14 | 1.96 | |
| 1.2 | 5.15 | 66.7 | ||||
| 1.3 | 6.29 | 92.4 | ||||
| 1.4 | 9.15 | 99.8 | ||||
| 1.5 | 11.7 | 100. | ||||
| 1.6 | 9.26 | 100. | ||||
| 1.7 | 7.98 | 100. | ||||
| 1.8 | 9.79 | 100. | ||||
--E. Long 21:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
