Difference between revisions of "Elong-13-10-11b"
From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (New page: Patricia and I asked Oscar why we had put a 12.2 degree limit on the HMS, thinking that the cause was due to the polarized target. This turned out to be true. In his e-mail, Oscar said: <...) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
You can see the details here | You can see the details here | ||
| − | [https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/weekly/dunne_beamline_120707.pdf https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/weekly/dunne_beamline_120707.pdf]</blockquote> | + | [https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/weekly/dunne_beamline_120707.pdf https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/weekly/dunne_beamline_120707.pdf]"</blockquote> |
Revision as of 14:26, 11 October 2013
Patricia and I asked Oscar why we had put a 12.2 degree limit on the HMS, thinking that the cause was due to the polarized target. This turned out to be true. In his e-mail, Oscar said:
"For longitudinal field, the HMS could go to narrower angles, as long as
the beam line can fit the slow raster radius with about 1 cm clearance from the raster envelope downstream of the target. For transverse fields, the beam deflection interferes with the first quad, so the minimum angle is about 14-15 degrees, to avoid huge backgrounds.
You can see the details here
https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/weekly/dunne_beamline_120707.pdf"
