Difference between revisions of "Elong-14-04-04"
From HallCWiki
(New page: =Q^2 Scan of Azz= With 24 PAC days + commissioning time, we can make a Q^2 scan of Azz from 0.8 (GeV/c)^2 < Q^2 < 2.0 (GeV/c)^2. The two higher points (1.2 and 2.0) seem to be the most in...) |
(→Q^2 Scan of Azz) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Q^2 Scan of Azz= | =Q^2 Scan of Azz= | ||
| − | With 24 PAC days + commissioning time, we can make a Q^2 scan of Azz from 0.8 (GeV/c)^2 < Q^2 < 2.0 (GeV/c)^2. The two higher points (1.2 and 2.0) seem to be the most interesting, but also take the most time (7 and 14 days, respectively). With an extra 3 days, we can also take points at Q^2=0.8, 0.6, and 0.3 (GeV/c)^2. | + | With 24 PAC days + commissioning time, we can make a Q^2 scan of Azz from 0.8 (GeV/c)^2 < Q^2 < 2.0 (GeV/c)^2. The two higher points (1.2 and 2.0) seem to be the most interesting, but also take the most time (7 and 14 days, respectively). With an extra 3 days, we can also take points at Q^2=0.8, 0.6, and 0.3 (GeV/c)^2. All plots shown using LiD (without using He2D, since I think we're getting outside of the range of that approximation being useful. If it is, you could reduce the time by ~factor of 2 for the same uncertainties) and Pzz=30%. |
{| border=1 | {| border=1 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
{| border=1 | {| border=1 | ||
| Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
{| border=1 | {| border=1 | ||
| Line 23: | Line 27: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
{| border=1 | {| border=1 | ||
| Line 30: | Line 36: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
{| border=1 | {| border=1 | ||
| Line 37: | Line 45: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Ellie|E. Long]] 17:45, 16 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:45, 16 April 2014
Q^2 Scan of Azz
With 24 PAC days + commissioning time, we can make a Q^2 scan of Azz from 0.8 (GeV/c)^2 < Q^2 < 2.0 (GeV/c)^2. The two higher points (1.2 and 2.0) seem to be the most interesting, but also take the most time (7 and 14 days, respectively). With an extra 3 days, we can also take points at Q^2=0.8, 0.6, and 0.3 (GeV/c)^2. All plots shown using LiD (without using He2D, since I think we're getting outside of the range of that approximation being useful. If it is, you could reduce the time by ~factor of 2 for the same uncertainties) and Pzz=30%.
| Q^2=2.0 (GeV/c)^2, E_{beam}=11.0 GeV, PAC Time = 336 hours |
|---|
|
| Q^2=1.2 (GeV/c)^2, E_{beam}=8.8 GeV, PAC Time = 168 hours |
|---|
|
| Q^2=0.8 (GeV/c)^2, E_{beam}=6.6 GeV, PAC Time = 36 hours |
|---|
|
| Q^2=0.6 (GeV/c)^2, E_{beam}=4.4 GeV, PAC Time = 12 hours |
|---|
|
| Q^2=0.3 (GeV/c)^2, E_{beam}=2.2 GeV, PAC Time = 6 hours |
|---|
|
--E. Long 17:45, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
