Difference between revisions of "D2n kinematics"
From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | = Run Plan ( | + | = Run Plan 2020 = |
− | * [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NCFehy_w7i-dfH9_Mgn403ec1e-D3Kqb1D2_muhI8FM/edit?usp=sharing Draft d2n Run Plan] | + | <span style="font-size:200%">Updated Page is here: [[d2n Run Plan 2020]]</span> |
+ | -------------------------------------------------- | ||
+ | |||
+ | = Run Plan (old notes/no longer current) = | ||
+ | *; [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NCFehy_w7i-dfH9_Mgn403ec1e-D3Kqb1D2_muhI8FM/edit?usp=sharing Draft d2n Run Plan] | ||
** '''NOTE''': The SHMS + HMS kinematic pairings are different that what we were planning when those tables were constructed. We are starting with '''HMS Kin C''' and SHMS Kin X. | ** '''NOTE''': The SHMS + HMS kinematic pairings are different that what we were planning when those tables were constructed. We are starting with '''HMS Kin C''' and SHMS Kin X. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *; Updated rate and yield estimates for kinematics and beam energies below (March 19, 2020) [W. Korsch] | ||
+ | ** [[Media:RateUpdate-Korsch_19Mar2020.pdf|Rate Estimate Updates (19 Mar 2020)]] (NOTE: Ignore the ''primed'' kinematics, they are not relevant anymore.) | ||
= Rough / High-level sketch of d2n kinematic settings = | = Rough / High-level sketch of d2n kinematic settings = | ||
Line 16: | Line 23: | ||
--------- HMS ---------- | --------- HMS ---------- | ||
E' theta x Q2 W | E' theta x Q2 W | ||
− | A | + | A -4.2 13.5 0.207 2.414 3.178 |
− | B | + | B -4.2 16.4 0.305 3.554 2.993 |
− | *C | + | *C -4.0 20.0 0.418 5.018 2.806 [Starting here] -- Only setting compatible with SOLID Cherenkov small-angle test. |
--------- SHMS ---------- | --------- SHMS ---------- | ||
E' theta x Q2 W | E' theta x Q2 W | ||
− | *X | + | *X -7.5 11.0 0.527 2.866 1.859 [Starting here] |
− | Y | + | Y -6.4 14.5 0.565 4.240 2.036 |
− | Z | + | Z -5.6 18.0 0.633 5.701 2.046 |
− | * '''Not shown is the 1-pass running''' ( | + | * '''Not shown is the 1-pass running''' (3'ish days) |
Line 43: | Line 50: | ||
== More Detailed Plan for when beam is handed to us (as of Sunday, August 2) == | == More Detailed Plan for when beam is handed to us (as of Sunday, August 2) == | ||
− | + | <strike> | |
− | |||
- Moller measurement will be done on first available day shift -- looks like Monday DAY at this point | - Moller measurement will be done on first available day shift -- looks like Monday DAY at this point | ||
Line 56: | Line 62: | ||
- H2 @ 10 Atm | - H2 @ 10 Atm | ||
- Empty / Vacuum | - Empty / Vacuum | ||
+ | </strike> | ||
+ | |||
- Then move into production running: | - Then move into production running: | ||
HMS Kin C, SHMS Kin X (Total time: 125 PAC hours, ~10 calendar days) | HMS Kin C, SHMS Kin X (Total time: 125 PAC hours, ~10 calendar days) | ||
Line 88: | Line 96: | ||
*; Minimal/no positron running? | *; Minimal/no positron running? | ||
− | ** Perhaps measure the positron background in HMS at | + | ** Perhaps measure the positron background in HMS at 13.5 degrees (Kin A) and compare with model as a sanity check? If it matches model, then we can skip the rest? |
Line 94: | Line 102: | ||
* Request pass change to 1-pass | * Request pass change to 1-pass | ||
** Controlled Access to install collimator (RadCon) | ** Controlled Access to install collimator (RadCon) | ||
+ | ** Check on EPR photo-diode status (replace if needed) | ||
+ | ** Simona will be doing some SOLID Cherenkov work during this time as well | ||
* Restore 1-pass beam to Hall | * Restore 1-pass beam to Hall | ||
** '''Moller measurement ASAP''' | ** '''Moller measurement ASAP''' | ||
** Turn off hodoscope bars as before: HMS [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3756736]; SHMS [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3760238] | ** Turn off hodoscope bars as before: HMS [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3756736]; SHMS [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3760238] | ||
− | ** | + | ** For raster need to have MCC click on the button on the Expert page for 1 coil ( instead of 2 coils). Then need to be sure that to use the "gbeam_pass1_jan2020.param" is being used for analysis. |
* Begin production running following A1n 1-pass notes [[1-pass_calibration_for_A1n_(Jan_2020)]] | * Begin production running following A1n 1-pass notes [[1-pass_calibration_for_A1n_(Jan_2020)]] | ||
* '''3He elastic and QE longitudinal Asymmetries''' (incl. pressure curve / ref cell running) | * '''3He elastic and QE longitudinal Asymmetries''' (incl. pressure curve / ref cell running) |
Latest revision as of 15:02, 17 August 2020
Run Plan 2020
Updated Page is here: d2n Run Plan 2020
Run Plan (old notes/no longer current)
-
- NOTE: The SHMS + HMS kinematic pairings are different that what we were planning when those tables were constructed. We are starting with HMS Kin C and SHMS Kin X.
- Updated rate and yield estimates for kinematics and beam energies below (March 19, 2020) [W. Korsch]
- Rate Estimate Updates (19 Mar 2020) (NOTE: Ignore the primed kinematics, they are not relevant anymore.)
Rough / High-level sketch of d2n kinematic settings
Reduced kinematics list to accommodate limited beam time (dropped 1/4 of kinematics)
--------- Beam Params ---------- E_beam = 10.4 GeV/c I_beam = 30 uA P_targ = 0.50 P_beam = 0.80
--------- HMS ---------- E' theta x Q2 W A -4.2 13.5 0.207 2.414 3.178 B -4.2 16.4 0.305 3.554 2.993 *C -4.0 20.0 0.418 5.018 2.806 [Starting here] -- Only setting compatible with SOLID Cherenkov small-angle test.
--------- SHMS ---------- E' theta x Q2 W *X -7.5 11.0 0.527 2.866 1.859 [Starting here] Y -6.4 14.5 0.565 4.240 2.036 Z -5.6 18.0 0.633 5.701 2.046
- Not shown is the 1-pass running (3'ish days)
Schedule Overview
- We should expect to have 6 weeks of beam
- Hall C will have priority over Hall A (if there are beam loading, machine stability issues)
- Rough priorities:
We plan to start at 5-pass with kinematics A and X (small angle)- We will start at 5-pass with kinematics C and X (small angle on SHMS, large angle on HMS)
- This will allow the SOLID Cerenkov prototype folks to setup before beam and run their small-angle test on the HMS side.
- Then move to kin A and Z (high-Q2 SHMS, small angle HMS)
- Scheduling of Kin B, Y and 1-pass running would depend on how the Accel/target/virus behaves
More Detailed Plan for when beam is handed to us (as of Sunday, August 2)
- Moller measurement will be done on first available day shift -- looks like Monday DAY at this point
- Sanity check beam positions, harp profiles and convince ourselves the tune is still good (no need for Carbon Hole study unless something is really strange)
- Ion Chamber calibrations (if not done already)
- Reference cell filled with N2 @ 10 Atm - Carbon Optics
- If the target is still pumping up, or if there are any concerns about the 'real' beam polarization, then
- Reference cell runs: 2 beam-hours each (skip He3 for now) - N2 @ 10 Atm - H2 @ 10 Atm - Empty / Vacuum
- Then move into production running:
HMS Kin C, SHMS Kin X (Total time: 125 PAC hours, ~10 calendar days) - Flip IHWP every 4--8 hours - Ensure Charge Asym Feedback is running/working - Take NMR meas. every ~5 hours - Target: Transverse - Flip target spin at 36 hours - 3-4 calendar days in, switch target to Longitudinal - Target: Longitudinal - Flip IHWP at 1/2 way into each run block (~4 hours) - ~11 hours @ 0deg - ~11 hours @ 180deg - Switch back to Transverse - Target: Transverse - 3-4 calendar days until Kin C/X are done - Flip target spin at 36 hours in
- Reference cell runs - Complete N2, H2, empty ref cell runs not completed yet (may be used as fill after a target spin flip/rotation) - He3 @ 10 hours (2 beam-hours) -- Do this once at the end of this kinematic
- This should take roughly 10 calendar days. - We'll then move to 1-pass for 3 days, then back to 5-pass and follow the above prescription for the remaining Kin A/Z, Kin B/Y
Non-"production" runs
- Optics are generally in good shape, but we will should take more for HMS kin B (4.2 GeV/C @ 16.4 deg)
- Analyze and get the new matrices in the analyzer
- Make sure we have empty target runs for all kinematics help disentangle beamline window contributions
- Nail down estimates for ref cell running (N2, H2, 3He, empty)
- Minimal/no positron running?
- Perhaps measure the positron background in HMS at 13.5 degrees (Kin A) and compare with model as a sanity check? If it matches model, then we can skip the rest?
1-pass running considerations
- Request pass change to 1-pass
- Controlled Access to install collimator (RadCon)
- Check on EPR photo-diode status (replace if needed)
- Simona will be doing some SOLID Cherenkov work during this time as well
- Restore 1-pass beam to Hall
- Begin production running following A1n 1-pass notes 1-pass_calibration_for_A1n_(Jan_2020)
- 3He elastic and QE longitudinal Asymmetries (incl. pressure curve / ref cell running)
- HMS setting: 11.7 deg, -2.1483 GeV/c
- SHMS setting: 8.5 deg, -2.12860 GeV/c
- Polarized 3He Delta Transverse Asymmetry
- HMS setting: 11.7 deg, -1.75830 GeV/c (electron W=1.232)
- SHMS setting: 8.5 deg, -1.79736 GeV/c (electron W=1.232)
- Pol 3He Elastic Measurement (E12-06-121A)
- Details Coming Soon