Difference between revisions of "Monday, November 08 , 2021"
From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
definitive meeting date and time, and effectively communicate it to other contributors. | definitive meeting date and time, and effectively communicate it to other contributors. | ||
− | == | + | == Items Discussed == |
+ | 1. Re-doing simulations at more realistic beam energy to get more realistic yields (Dien will start looking at this) | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. Preparing CaFe online analysis (via GitHub) with relevant monitoring scripts, full replays, calibration scripts, etc. <br> | ||
+ | And set up CaFe wiki with the relevant run information. (Carlos will start looking at this) | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. Other items: | ||
+ | * at which specific kinematics to take elastics hydrogen, as the CaFe the proposal does not specify this. | ||
+ | * whether to take Al. dummy data, and for which targets, | ||
+ | * is there a plan for luminosity scan (to determine target boiling), or can we use other experiment's results? |
Latest revision as of 11:25, 15 November 2021
Summary
In our first meeting, Dien and I discussed plan on moving forward with preparation for CaFe as early as possible, determine a definitive meeting date and time, and effectively communicate it to other contributors.
Items Discussed
1. Re-doing simulations at more realistic beam energy to get more realistic yields (Dien will start looking at this)
2. Preparing CaFe online analysis (via GitHub) with relevant monitoring scripts, full replays, calibration scripts, etc.
And set up CaFe wiki with the relevant run information. (Carlos will start looking at this)
3. Other items:
- at which specific kinematics to take elastics hydrogen, as the CaFe the proposal does not specify this.
- whether to take Al. dummy data, and for which targets,
- is there a plan for luminosity scan (to determine target boiling), or can we use other experiment's results?