Difference between revisions of "Monday, December 06, 2021"
From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Holly and I did simulations of 12C(e,e'p) using the same kinematics and spectrometer acceptance cuts. See [https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/8/8c/CaFe_SIMC_sanityCheck.pdf CaFe SIMC Sanity Check] | * Holly and I did simulations of 12C(e,e'p) using the same kinematics and spectrometer acceptance cuts. See [https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/8/8c/CaFe_SIMC_sanityCheck.pdf CaFe SIMC Sanity Check] | ||
* From these results, comparisons look OK for the most part. There is a slight difference for the y_tar distribution in the HMS which seems to be related to smearing effects, but this is on-going work, to try and figure out what is the cause, and which part of the SIMC code is this applied to. | * From these results, comparisons look OK for the most part. There is a slight difference for the y_tar distribution in the HMS which seems to be related to smearing effects, but this is on-going work, to try and figure out what is the cause, and which part of the SIMC code is this applied to. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | 2. Dien will try to run SIMC for C12 using same input file as Carlos input file | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. Carlos will investigate why is the proton acceptance in the simulation smaller than in Rey's report, which extends several degrees, to make a kinematic scan for optimization. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. Dien and Carlos will develop optimization code based on Carlos' simulation file | ||
Latest revision as of 13:04, 6 December 2021
Discussion Topics
1. Sanity check of CaFe simulations using C12 low pmiss setting
- Holly and I did simulations of 12C(e,e'p) using the same kinematics and spectrometer acceptance cuts. See CaFe SIMC Sanity Check
- From these results, comparisons look OK for the most part. There is a slight difference for the y_tar distribution in the HMS which seems to be related to smearing effects, but this is on-going work, to try and figure out what is the cause, and which part of the SIMC code is this applied to.
2. Dien will try to run SIMC for C12 using same input file as Carlos input file
3. Carlos will investigate why is the proton acceptance in the simulation smaller than in Rey's report, which extends several degrees, to make a kinematic scan for optimization.
4. Dien and Carlos will develop optimization code based on Carlos' simulation file
