Difference between revisions of "Observables"

From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: A couple of words about A<sub>xx</sub> and how to measure it:<br> 180px with an absolute systematic uncertainty estimated from, 180px [[Image:3.png|18...)
 
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
[[Image:1.png|180px]]
 
[[Image:1.png|180px]]
  
with an absolute systematic uncertainty estimated from,
+
A<sub>xx</sub> is an asymmetry so take advantage of numerator denominator  systematics cancellation:<br>
  
 +
1.) Measure N<sub>p</sub> and N<sub>u</sub> with same cup same exact material <br>
 +
2.) Use same B-field <br>
 +
3.) Use NMR on both to measure polarization and un-polarization <br>
 +
4.) Let beam heating an off larmor microwave control un-polarization <br>
 +
5.) Keep both cold (~1K) <br>
 +
6.) Switch from pol to unpol frequently <br>
 +
 +
For unpolarized electron beam the helicity dependent cross sections are: <br>
 
[[Image:2.png|180px]]
 
[[Image:2.png|180px]]
 +
[[Image:3.png|150px]]<br>
 +
Where in the deuteron rest frame the spin is quantized in the direction of the virtual photon<br>
  
 +
This means there is a direct relationship to first component analyzing power<br>
  
 +
[[Image:0.png|230px]]
  
[[Image:3.png|180px]]
+
which is very much accessible with e+D->e+N+X and e+D->e+X (be weary of background) <br>
 
+
Modern (2006) Thesis [http://blast.lns.mit.edu/PUBLIC_RESULTS/THESES/Zhang_thesis.pdf] <br>
 
 
[[Image:4.png|180px]]
 
  
To obtain tensor polarization by optimizing vector polarization we expect a tensor polarization of
+
In addition we have a direct relationship to b1 for low x (be weary uncertainties) <br>
P<sub>zz</sub>=2-(4-3P<sup>2</sup>)<sup>1/2</sup> assuming a Boltzman distribution at thermal equilibrium. <br>
 
[[Image:5.png|180px]]
 
But not at thermal equilibrium under experiment (trying not to under estimate error)<br>
 
Analytic relation not applicable for tensor Optimization (hole burning)<br>
 
  
General limitations for all tensor polarized experiments to keep in mind: <br>
+
[[Image:5.png|200px]]
1.) Ideal P<sub>zz</sub> =2.5%-5% <br>
 
2.) Vector Optimized P<sub>zz</sub> =6.5%-12% <br>
 
3.) Tensor Optimized P<sub>zz</sub> =15%-25% <br>
 
4.) Negative tensor polarization not yet achieved without hole burning (very unstable) <br>
 

Latest revision as of 14:15, 25 April 2013

A couple of words about Axx and how to measure it:

1.png

Axx is an asymmetry so take advantage of numerator denominator systematics cancellation:

1.) Measure Np and Nu with same cup same exact material
2.) Use same B-field
3.) Use NMR on both to measure polarization and un-polarization
4.) Let beam heating an off larmor microwave control un-polarization
5.) Keep both cold (~1K)
6.) Switch from pol to unpol frequently

For unpolarized electron beam the helicity dependent cross sections are:
2.png 3.png
Where in the deuteron rest frame the spin is quantized in the direction of the virtual photon

This means there is a direct relationship to first component analyzing power

0.png

which is very much accessible with e+D->e+N+X and e+D->e+X (be weary of background)
Modern (2006) Thesis [1]

In addition we have a direct relationship to b1 for low x (be weary uncertainties)

5.png