Difference between revisions of "2022 JLAB REVIEW"
(→Agenda) |
|||
(14 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Here is the conditional review panel [https://www.dropbox.com/s/os0gvga8lhiqs8d/TensorCharge.pdf?dl=0 Charge]. | Here is the conditional review panel [https://www.dropbox.com/s/os0gvga8lhiqs8d/TensorCharge.pdf?dl=0 Charge]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''The Conditional Review Report can be found here: [https://nuclear.unh.edu/~elong/docs/TensorFinalReport_final.pdf Final Report]''' | ||
+ | |||
Line 15: | Line 20: | ||
'''Remote connection:''' https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1618705690?pwd=SVFTVWcrQml2aU43azNTN0R0WTNhdz09 | '''Remote connection:''' https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1618705690?pwd=SVFTVWcrQml2aU43azNTN0R0WTNhdz09 | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Committee:''' Chris Keith (chair), Josh Pierce, Rolf Ent | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
Line 20: | Line 27: | ||
12:45 - 1:00: Executive session | 12:45 - 1:00: Executive session | ||
− | 1:00 - 1:10: | + | 1:00 - 1:10: Intro/Overview, K. Slifer (10) [https://www.dropbox.com/s/x8u2v64cga2a19f/2022_slifer_tensor_review_2022_0731.pdf?dl=0 (pdf)] |
− | 1:10 - 1:50: Discussions of the charges Pt. I, (Charges 1,2,3,4), D. Keller (30+10)[ | + | 1:10 - 1:50: Discussions of the charges Pt. I, (Charges 1,2,3,4), D. Keller (30+10)[https://confluence.its.virginia.edu/display/twist/Group+Talks?preview=/13377818/107388205/TensorConditional_dk.pdf (pdf)] |
1:50 - 2:00: Coffee break | 1:50 - 2:00: Coffee break | ||
− | 2:00 - 2:40: Discussions of the charges Pt. II, (Charges 2,3), E. Long (30+10) [https://nuclear.unh.edu/~elong/talks/2022-08-01-ELong-TensorCond.pdf (pdf)] [https://nuclear.unh.edu/~elong/technotes/T22-005.pdf (Related T20 technote)] | + | 2:00 - 2:40: Discussions of the charges Pt. II, (Charges 2,3), E. Long (30+10) [https://nuclear.unh.edu/~elong/talks/2022-08-01-ELong-TensorCond.pdf (pdf)] [https://nuclear.unh.edu/~elong/talks/2022-08-01-ELong-TensorCond.pptx (pptx)] [https://nuclear.unh.edu/~elong/technotes/T22-005.pdf (Related T20 technote)] |
− | 2:40 - 2:55: Summary | + | 2:40 - 2:55: Summary, S. N. Santiesteban (15) [https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/7/7e/Summary_sns.pdf (pdf)] |
2:55 - 3:00: Coffee break | 2:55 - 3:00: Coffee break |
Latest revision as of 15:11, 19 October 2023
The C1 conditional status of the b1 and Azz experiments collaborations will be reviewed at Jefferson Lab on August 1, 2022.
Here is the conditional review panel Charge.
The Conditional Review Report can be found here: Final Report
Review Meeting
Date: August 1, 2022
Time: 12:45 pm EST
Room: F324-325 at CEBAF center
Remote connection: https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1618705690?pwd=SVFTVWcrQml2aU43azNTN0R0WTNhdz09
Committee: Chris Keith (chair), Josh Pierce, Rolf Ent
Agenda
12:45 - 1:00: Executive session
1:00 - 1:10: Intro/Overview, K. Slifer (10) (pdf)
1:10 - 1:50: Discussions of the charges Pt. I, (Charges 1,2,3,4), D. Keller (30+10)(pdf)
1:50 - 2:00: Coffee break
2:00 - 2:40: Discussions of the charges Pt. II, (Charges 2,3), E. Long (30+10) (pdf) (pptx) (Related T20 technote)
2:40 - 2:55: Summary, S. N. Santiesteban (15) (pdf)
2:55 - 3:00: Coffee break
3:00 - 4:00: Open discussion
4:00 - 5:00: Executive session
5:00: Closeout
Below we briefly summarize the progress that has been made in addressing the conditional status.
Progress in Tensor Enhancement
The b1 and Azz experiments were C1 conditionally approved by PACs 41&44, respectively, with the requirement that: "a tensor polarization of at least (close to) 30% be achieved and reliably demonstrated under experimental conditions." Links to the PAC reviews are provided below. Our collaboration has recently demonstrated that a tensor polarization of at least 30% will be achieved under experimental conditions.
So we request Jefferson Lab to fully approve these two experiments.
The details supporting our request to remove the C1 conditionals are available here.
As a brief summary, the left panel of the figure above shows tensor enhancement using the technique of semi-saturating RF (ss-RF) with continuous rotation of the target material. The points corresponds to the measured NMR data and the red line is the lineshape fit of the NMR spectra. This fit was used to extract the tensor polarization value of 36+-3.5%. The full lineshape is composed of the magnetic sublevel transitions m=1 → 0 (Blue) and m=0 → -1 (pink) lines. The right panel of the figure shows the predicted vector and tensor enhanced polarizations as a function of accumulated dose during experimental conditions. The vertical dotted line indicates the dose at which an anneal will be performed in order to keep the overall tensor polarization at 30%. Full details for these plots and supporting documentation is provided in the links on this wikipage.
Recent Tensor Enhancement Papers by the Collaboration
Modeling alignment enhancement for solid polarized targets | Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 155 (2017) (arXiv) |
Enhanced tensor polarization in solid-state targets | NIM A 981, 164504 (2020) (arXiv) |
Experiment Information
Experiment | Scientific Rate | PAC Decision | PAC Results |
---|---|---|---|
The Deuteron Tensor Structure Function b1 (pdf) | A- | C1 | link |
Measurements of the Quasi-Elastic and Elastic Deuteron Tensor Asymmetries (pdf) | A- | C1 | link |