Difference between revisions of "Elong-13-10-07"

From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Azz Re-Optimization==
 
==Azz Re-Optimization==
  
−
Using the Bosted code, which now uses the complete cross-section with both [[Elong-13-10-01#Inelastic_and_Quasielastic_Structure_Functions|QE and DIS]] parts, [[Elong-13-10-04|has been checked against previous data]], and uses [[Elong-13-10-01|the full dilution factor]], I've gone back through beam energies of 6.6, 4.4, and 2.2 GeV and optimized the physics rates while keeping the total rates below the DAQ maximum (without prescales) of 3kHz.
+
Using the Bosted code, which now uses the complete cross-section with both [[Elong-13-10-01#Inelastic_and_Quasielastic_Structure_Functions|QE and DIS]] parts, [[Elong-13-10-04|has been checked against previous data]], and uses [[Elong-13-10-01|the full dilution factor]], I've gone back through beam energies of 6.6, 4.4, and 2.2 GeV and optimized the physics rates while keeping the total rates below the DAQ maximum (without prescales) of 3kHz. For each of the uncertainty estimates below, the dilution factor used was calculated from the SHMS cross-sections. Pzz is assumed to be 30%.
  
  
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1"
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1"
−
! colspan="2" | <math>E_{\mathrm{beam}}=6.6\mathrm{~GeV}</math>
+
! colspan="2" | $E_{\mathrm{beam}}=6.6\mathrm{~GeV}$
 
|-
 
|-
−
|<math>\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}=12.382^{\circ}</math><br>
+
|$\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}=12.382^{\circ}$<br>
−
<math>\mathrm{HMS~}E'=5.862\mathrm{~GeV}</math><br>
+
$\mathrm{HMS~}E'=5.862\mathrm{~GeV}$<br>
−
<math>\mathrm{HMS~}Q^2=1.800\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2</math><br>
+
$\mathrm{HMS~}Q^2=1.800\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2$<br>
−
||<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}=8.231^{\circ}</math><br>
+
||$\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}=8.231^{\circ}$<br>
−
<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}E'=6.252\mathrm{~GeV}</math><br>
+
$\mathrm{SHMS~}E'=6.252\mathrm{~GeV}$<br>
−
<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}Q^2=0.850\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2</math><br>
+
$\mathrm{SHMS~}Q^2=0.850\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2$<br>
 
|-  
 
|-  
−
| colspan="2" | [[Image:2013-10-07-e-66-opt.png]][[Image:2013-10-07-e-66-opt-cs.png]]
+
| colspan="2" | [[Image:2013-10-07-e-66-opt.png]][[Image:2013-10-07-e-66-opt-cs.png|400px]]
 
|-   
 
|-   
 
|}
 
|}
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1"
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1"
−
! colspan="2" | <math>E_{\mathrm{beam}}=4.4\mathrm{~GeV}</math>
+
! colspan="2" | $E_{\mathrm{beam}}=4.4\mathrm{~GeV}$
 
|-
 
|-
−
|<math>\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}=12.212^{\circ}</math><br>
+
|$\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}=12.212^{\circ}$<br>
−
<math>\mathrm{HMS~}E'=4.068\mathrm{~GeV}</math><br>
+
$\mathrm{HMS~}E'=4.068\mathrm{~GeV}$<br>
−
<math>\mathrm{HMS~}Q^2=0.810\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2</math><br>
+
$\mathrm{HMS~}Q^2=0.810\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2$<br>
−
||<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}=10.395^{\circ}</math><br>
+
||$\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}=10.395^{\circ}$<br>
−
<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}E'=4.154\mathrm{~GeV}</math><br>
+
$\mathrm{SHMS~}E'=4.154\mathrm{~GeV}$<br>
−
<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}Q^2=0.600\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2</math><br>
+
$\mathrm{SHMS~}Q^2=0.600\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2$<br>
 
|-  
 
|-  
−
| colspan="2" | [[Image:2013-10-07-e-44-opt.png]][[Image:2013-10-07-e-44-opt-cs.png]]
+
| colspan="2" | [[Image:2013-10-07-e-44-opt.png]][[Image:2013-10-07-e-44-opt-cs.png|400px]]
 
|-   
 
|-   
 
|}
 
|}
Line 39: Line 39:
  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1"
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1"
−
! colspan="2" | <math>E_{\mathrm{beam}}=2.2\mathrm{~GeV}</math>
+
! colspan="2" | $E_{\mathrm{beam}}=2.2\mathrm{~GeV}$
 
|-
 
|-
−
|<math>\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}=16.474^{\circ}</math><br>
+
|$\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}=16.474^{\circ}$<br>
−
<math>\mathrm{HMS~}E'=2.048\mathrm{~GeV}</math><br>
+
$\mathrm{HMS~}E'=2.048\mathrm{~GeV}$<br>
−
<math>\mathrm{HMS~}Q^2=0.370\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2</math><br>
+
$\mathrm{HMS~}Q^2=0.370\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2$<br>
−
||<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}=15.490^{\circ}</math><br>
+
||$\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}=15.490^{\circ}$<br>
−
<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}E'=2.065\mathrm{~GeV}</math><br>
+
$\mathrm{SHMS~}E'=2.065\mathrm{~GeV}$<br>
−
<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}Q^2=0.330\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2</math><br>
+
$\mathrm{SHMS~}Q^2=0.330\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2$<br>
 
|-  
 
|-  
−
| colspan="2" | [[Image:2013-10-07-e-22-opt.png]][[Image:2013-10-07-e-22-opt-cs.png]]
+
| colspan="2" | [[Image:2013-10-07-e-22-opt.png]][[Image:2013-10-07-e-22-opt-cs.png|400px]]
 
|-   
 
|-   
 +
| colspan="2" | Note: The HMS rates are higher than the SHMS rates, but the cross-sections show the opposite. I believe this is due to the HMS angular acceptance being slightly larger than the SHMS's.
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
 +
--[[User:Ellie|E. Long]] 18:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:56, 18 October 2023

Azz Re-Optimization

Using the Bosted code, which now uses the complete cross-section with both QE and DIS parts, has been checked against previous data, and uses the full dilution factor, I've gone back through beam energies of 6.6, 4.4, and 2.2 GeV and optimized the physics rates while keeping the total rates below the DAQ maximum (without prescales) of 3kHz. For each of the uncertainty estimates below, the dilution factor used was calculated from the SHMS cross-sections. Pzz is assumed to be 30%.


6.6 GeV Optimization Results

$E_{\mathrm{beam}}=6.6\mathrm{~GeV}$
$\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}=12.382^{\circ}$

$\mathrm{HMS~}E'=5.862\mathrm{~GeV}$
$\mathrm{HMS~}Q^2=1.800\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2$

 $\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}=8.231^{\circ}$

$\mathrm{SHMS~}E'=6.252\mathrm{~GeV}$
$\mathrm{SHMS~}Q^2=0.850\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2$

2013-10-07-e-66-opt.png2013-10-07-e-66-opt-cs.png

4.4 GeV Optimization Results

$E_{\mathrm{beam}}=4.4\mathrm{~GeV}$
$\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}=12.212^{\circ}$

$\mathrm{HMS~}E'=4.068\mathrm{~GeV}$
$\mathrm{HMS~}Q^2=0.810\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2$

 $\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}=10.395^{\circ}$

$\mathrm{SHMS~}E'=4.154\mathrm{~GeV}$
$\mathrm{SHMS~}Q^2=0.600\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2$

2013-10-07-e-44-opt.png2013-10-07-e-44-opt-cs.png

2.2 GeV Optimization Results

$E_{\mathrm{beam}}=2.2\mathrm{~GeV}$
$\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}=16.474^{\circ}$

$\mathrm{HMS~}E'=2.048\mathrm{~GeV}$
$\mathrm{HMS~}Q^2=0.370\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2$

 $\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}=15.490^{\circ}$

$\mathrm{SHMS~}E'=2.065\mathrm{~GeV}$
$\mathrm{SHMS~}Q^2=0.330\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2$

2013-10-07-e-22-opt.png2013-10-07-e-22-opt-cs.png
Note: The HMS rates are higher than the SHMS rates, but the cross-sections show the opposite. I believe this is due to the HMS angular acceptance being slightly larger than the SHMS's.


--E. Long 18:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://hallcweb-2024.jlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=Elong-13-10-07&oldid=22754"