Difference between revisions of "Elong-13-10-08"

From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: ===Azz Rates=== To look at the physics we want to, we'll need to keep <math>Q^2>1</math>. We can do that best with a 6.6 GeV beam and the following kinematics: {| class="wikitable" style...)
 
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Azz Rates===
+
==Azz Rates==
  
To look at the physics we want to, we'll need to keep <math>Q^2>1</math>. We can do that best with a 6.6 GeV beam and the following kinematics:
+
To look at the physics we want to, we'll need to keep $Q^2>1$. With [[Elong-13-10-04#Shutz:1976_Data|Bosted's code matching well with previous data in this region]], and using Pzz=30%, our best estimates come with a 6.6 GeV beam and the following kinematics (using SHMS dilution factor calculations, since that's where the vast majority of data comes from):
  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1"
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1"
! colspan="2" | <math>E_{\mathrm{beam}}=6.6\mathrm{~GeV}</math>
+
! colspan="2" | $$E_{\mathrm{beam}}=6.6\mathrm{~GeV}$$
 
|-
 
|-
|<math>\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}=12.382^{\circ}</math><br>
+
|$$\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}=12.382^{\circ}$$
<math>\mathrm{HMS~}E'=5.862\mathrm{~GeV}</math><br>
+
$$\mathrm{HMS~}E'=5.862\mathrm{~GeV}$$
<math>\mathrm{HMS~}Q^2=1.800\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2</math><br>
+
$$\mathrm{HMS~}Q^2=1.800\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2$$
||<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}=8.231^{\circ}</math><br>
+
||$$\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}=8.231^{\circ}$$
<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}E'=6.252\mathrm{~GeV}</math><br>
+
$$\mathrm{SHMS~}E'=6.252\mathrm{~GeV}$$
<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}Q^2=0.850\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2</math><br>
+
$$\mathrm{SHMS~}Q^2=0.850\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2$$
 
|-  
 
|-  
 
| colspan="2" | '''1 Week Measurement'''<br>
 
| colspan="2" | '''1 Week Measurement'''<br>
[[Image:2013-10-08-e-66-1week.png]][[Image:2013-10-07-e-66-opt-cs.png|400px]]
+
[[Image:2013-10-08-e-66-1week.png|1000px]][[Image:2013-10-07-e-66-opt-cs.png|350px]]
 
|-   
 
|-   
 
| colspan="2" | '''2 Week Measurement'''<br>
 
| colspan="2" | '''2 Week Measurement'''<br>
[[Image:2013-10-08-e-66-2week.png]][[Image:2013-10-07-e-66-opt-cs.png|400px]]
+
[[Image:2013-10-08-e-66-2week.png|1000px]][[Image:2013-10-07-e-66-opt-cs.png|350px]]
 
|-   
 
|-   
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
--[[User:Ellie|E. Long]] 22:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:40, 18 October 2023

Azz Rates

To look at the physics we want to, we'll need to keep $Q^2>1$. With Bosted's code matching well with previous data in this region, and using Pzz=30%, our best estimates come with a 6.6 GeV beam and the following kinematics (using SHMS dilution factor calculations, since that's where the vast majority of data comes from):

$$E_{\mathrm{beam}}=6.6\mathrm{~GeV}$$
$$\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}=12.382^{\circ}$$

$$\mathrm{HMS~}E'=5.862\mathrm{~GeV}$$ $$\mathrm{HMS~}Q^2=1.800\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2$$

$$\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}=8.231^{\circ}$$

$$\mathrm{SHMS~}E'=6.252\mathrm{~GeV}$$ $$\mathrm{SHMS~}Q^2=0.850\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2$$

1 Week Measurement

2013-10-08-e-66-1week.png2013-10-07-e-66-opt-cs.png

2 Week Measurement

2013-10-08-e-66-2week.png2013-10-07-e-66-opt-cs.png

--E. Long 22:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)