Difference between revisions of "Elong-14-03-25"

From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Dilution Factor=
+
=Dilution Factor Check=
  
 
During the [http://www.jlab.org/conferences/tensor2014/ tensor workshop], it was pointed out how different the dilution factor looked between Misak's calculation and the full Bosted calculation. Remembering from a few months back, where I have the results at E=6.6 GeV, E'=6.07 GeV, & theta=9.51 degrees, I thought I'd revisit it.
 
During the [http://www.jlab.org/conferences/tensor2014/ tensor workshop], it was pointed out how different the dilution factor looked between Misak's calculation and the full Bosted calculation. Remembering from a few months back, where I have the results at E=6.6 GeV, E'=6.07 GeV, & theta=9.51 degrees, I thought I'd revisit it.
Line 7: Line 7:
 
If only the quasi-elastic part of Bosted is included, it reflects the Misak code much better. In general, if you break up the cross sections that go into the calculations, it's obvious that the difference is coming from the nitrogen contribution.
 
If only the quasi-elastic part of Bosted is included, it reflects the Misak code much better. In general, if you break up the cross sections that go into the calculations, it's obvious that the difference is coming from the nitrogen contribution.
  
{|border=1
+
{| border=1
 
! Deuteron !! Nitrogen
 
! Deuteron !! Nitrogen
 
|-
 
|-
 
| [[Image:2014-03-25-deuteron-cs.png|800px]] || [[Image:2014-03-25-nitrogen-cs.png|800px]]
 
| [[Image:2014-03-25-deuteron-cs.png|800px]] || [[Image:2014-03-25-nitrogen-cs.png|800px]]
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 12:59, 27 March 2014

Dilution Factor Check

During the tensor workshop, it was pointed out how different the dilution factor looked between Misak's calculation and the full Bosted calculation. Remembering from a few months back, where I have the results at E=6.6 GeV, E'=6.07 GeV, & theta=9.51 degrees, I thought I'd revisit it.

2014-03-25-fdil-check.png

If only the quasi-elastic part of Bosted is included, it reflects the Misak code much better. In general, if you break up the cross sections that go into the calculations, it's obvious that the difference is coming from the nitrogen contribution.

Deuteron Nitrogen
2014-03-25-deuteron-cs.png 2014-03-25-nitrogen-cs.png