Difference between revisions of "Elong-16-03-24"

From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: ==Wavefunction Comparisons== The major challenge issued by the PAC seems to be to more clearly show why Azz is a better observable than the unpolarized case for determining information on...)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Wavefunction Comparisons==
+
==Wavefunction Comparison Question==
  
 
The major challenge issued by the PAC seems to be to more clearly show why Azz is a better observable than the unpolarized case for determining information on the deuteron wave function. In particular, I think it would be helpful to show how our measurement could compare to one similar to this plot from PRL 108, 092502 (2012):
 
The major challenge issued by the PAC seems to be to more clearly show why Azz is a better observable than the unpolarized case for determining information on the deuteron wave function. In particular, I think it would be helpful to show how our measurement could compare to one similar to this plot from PRL 108, 092502 (2012):
Line 9: Line 9:
 
[[Image:2016-03-24-misak-fig1.png|500px]]
 
[[Image:2016-03-24-misak-fig1.png|500px]]
  
and atempted to add a plot of Azz, where I just took the distributions of the unpolarized and tensor-polarized case for each WF and put them into Azz=2*(pol-unpol)/unpol:
+
and attempted to add a plot of Azz, where I just took the distributions of the unpolarized and tensor-polarized case for each WF and put them into Azz=2*(pol-unpol)/unpol:
  
  
[[Image:2016-03-24-azz-test-lin.png|350px]] [[Image:2016-03-24-azz-test-log.png|350px]]
+
[[Image:2016-03-24-azz-test-lin.png|500px]] [[Image:2016-03-24-azz-test-log.png|500px]]
 +
 
 +
However, I'm unsure of the validity of this method, and also how it would change between Pzz=+1 and Pzz=-2, since that should change the result but at the moment I don't know how to incorporate it into this plot.

Latest revision as of 08:23, 24 March 2016

Wavefunction Comparison Question

The major challenge issued by the PAC seems to be to more clearly show why Azz is a better observable than the unpolarized case for determining information on the deuteron wave function. In particular, I think it would be helpful to show how our measurement could compare to one similar to this plot from PRL 108, 092502 (2012):

2016-03-24-nadia fig1.png

To attempt a comparison, I took the wavefunctions as listed in Misak's proceedings from the tensor workshop:

2016-03-24-misak-fig1.png

and attempted to add a plot of Azz, where I just took the distributions of the unpolarized and tensor-polarized case for each WF and put them into Azz=2*(pol-unpol)/unpol:


2016-03-24-azz-test-lin.png 2016-03-24-azz-test-log.png

However, I'm unsure of the validity of this method, and also how it would change between Pzz=+1 and Pzz=-2, since that should change the result but at the moment I don't know how to incorporate it into this plot.