Difference between revisions of "Final Look"
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
But not at thermal equilibrium under experiment (try not to under estimate error) | But not at thermal equilibrium under experiment (try not to under estimate error) | ||
Analytic relation not applicable for tensor Optimization (hole burning) | Analytic relation not applicable for tensor Optimization (hole burning) | ||
| − | Gerneral limitations for all tensor polarized experiments to keep in mind | + | Gerneral limitations for all tensor polarized experiments to keep in mind <br> |
| − | 1.) Ideal P<sub>zz=2.5%-5% | + | 1.) Ideal P<sub>zz=2.5%-5% <br> |
| − | 2.) Vector Optimized P<sub>zz=6.5%-12% | + | 2.) Vector Optimized P<sub>zz=6.5%-12% <br> |
| − | 3.) Tensor Optimized P<sub>zz=15%-25% | + | 3.) Tensor Optimized P<sub>zz=15%-25% <br> |
| − | 4.) Negative tensor polarization not yet achieved without hole burning (very unstable) | + | 4.) Negative tensor polarization not yet achieved without hole burning (very unstable) <br> |
Revision as of 09:50, 16 April 2013
Error estimate based on previous analysis using standard solid polarized targets results indicated in first write-up
based on an asymmetry Azz
with an absolute systematic uncertainty estimated from,
To obtain tensor polarization by optimizing vector polarization we expect a tensor polarization of
Pzz=2-(4-3P2)1/2 assuming a Boltzman distribution at thermal equilibrium.
But not at thermal equilibrium under experiment (try not to under estimate error)
Analytic relation not applicable for tensor Optimization (hole burning)
Gerneral limitations for all tensor polarized experiments to keep in mind
1.) Ideal Pzz=2.5%-5%
2.) Vector Optimized Pzz=6.5%-12%
3.) Tensor Optimized Pzz=15%-25%
4.) Negative tensor polarization not yet achieved without hole burning (very unstable)
→ Best Estimates for Cumulative Absolute Uncertainty
