Difference between revisions of "Elong-13-05-02"
From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 2: | Line 2: | ||
Rates code now matches what Patricia gets. The issue was in the spectrometer acceptance -- I was using a larger acceptance based on old calculations of what the SHMS could do. This has been fixed, the points on Azz and b1d have been moved to the central x value that the range is over, and the dark points on the kinematics plots show where the spectrometers will sit. This is using [[Elong-13-05-01-Azz-Method-2#Azz_Formalism_-_Method_2|what I've called Azz method 2]] to calculate the uncertainties. | Rates code now matches what Patricia gets. The issue was in the spectrometer acceptance -- I was using a larger acceptance based on old calculations of what the SHMS could do. This has been fixed, the points on Azz and b1d have been moved to the central x value that the range is over, and the dark points on the kinematics plots show where the spectrometers will sit. This is using [[Elong-13-05-01-Azz-Method-2#Azz_Formalism_-_Method_2|what I've called Azz method 2]] to calculate the uncertainties. | ||
− | == | + | ==No x Cuts, W>2== |
Cuts: W>2 | Cuts: W>2 |
Revision as of 18:02, 3 May 2013
Rates Update
Rates code now matches what Patricia gets. The issue was in the spectrometer acceptance -- I was using a larger acceptance based on old calculations of what the SHMS could do. This has been fixed, the points on Azz and b1d have been moved to the central x value that the range is over, and the dark points on the kinematics plots show where the spectrometers will sit. This is using what I've called Azz method 2 to calculate the uncertainties.
No x Cuts, W>2
Cuts: W>2
No x Cuts, Loose W cut
Cuts: W>1.85
--E. Long 20:59, 3 May 2013 (UTC)