Difference between revisions of "Elong-13-05-02"

From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Rates code now matches what Patricia gets. The issue was in the spectrometer acceptance -- I was using a larger acceptance based on old calculations of what the SHMS could do. This has been fixed, the points on Azz and b1d have been moved to the central x value that the range is over, and the dark points on the kinematics plots show where the spectrometers will sit. This is using [[Elong-13-05-01-Azz-Method-2#Azz_Formalism_-_Method_2|what I've called Azz method 2]] to calculate the uncertainties.
 
Rates code now matches what Patricia gets. The issue was in the spectrometer acceptance -- I was using a larger acceptance based on old calculations of what the SHMS could do. This has been fixed, the points on Azz and b1d have been moved to the central x value that the range is over, and the dark points on the kinematics plots show where the spectrometers will sit. This is using [[Elong-13-05-01-Azz-Method-2#Azz_Formalism_-_Method_2|what I've called Azz method 2]] to calculate the uncertainties.
  
==Current Good Estimate, No x Cuts==
+
==No x Cuts, W>2==
  
 
Cuts: W>2
 
Cuts: W>2

Revision as of 18:02, 3 May 2013

Rates Update

Rates code now matches what Patricia gets. The issue was in the spectrometer acceptance -- I was using a larger acceptance based on old calculations of what the SHMS could do. This has been fixed, the points on Azz and b1d have been moved to the central x value that the range is over, and the dark points on the kinematics plots show where the spectrometers will sit. This is using what I've called Azz method 2 to calculate the uncertainties.

No x Cuts, W>2

Cuts: W>2

2013-05-02-100percent.png

No x Cuts, Loose W cut

Cuts: W>1.85

2013-05-02-loosew.png

--E. Long 20:59, 3 May 2013 (UTC)