Difference between revisions of "Elong-13-05-02"
From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
f_phys=f_calc*0.95 | f_phys=f_calc*0.95 | ||
| − | W>1.85 | + | ''W''>1.85 |
| + | |||
| + | Rebinned ''x'' values so that they correspond to the ±''x'' error bars shown. For the highest two points, the SHMS and HMS data have been combined. | ||
[[Image: 2013-05-02-current-best.png]] | [[Image: 2013-05-02-current-best.png]] | ||
Revision as of 16:15, 4 May 2013
Rates Update
Rates code now matches what Patricia gets. The issue was in the spectrometer acceptance -- I was using a larger acceptance based on old calculations of what the SHMS could do. This has been fixed, the points on Azz and b1d have been moved to the central x value that the range is over, and the dark points on the kinematics plots show where the spectrometers will sit. This is using what I've called Azz method 2 to calculate the uncertainties.
No x Cuts, W>2
Cuts: W>2
No x Cuts, Loose W cut
Cuts: W>1.85
Current Best Numbers
f_phys=f_calc*0.95
W>1.85
Rebinned x values so that they correspond to the ±x error bars shown. For the highest two points, the SHMS and HMS data have been combined.
--E. Long 20:59, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
