Difference between revisions of "Elong-13-10-07"
(New page: ==Azz Re-Optimization== Using the Bosted code, which now uses the complete cross-section with both QE and DIS parts, [[El...) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| − | ===Optimization Results=== | + | ===6.6 GeV Optimization Results=== |
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1" | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===4.4 GeV Optimization Results=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1" | ||
| + | ! colspan="2" | <math>E_{\mathrm{beam}}=4.4\mathrm{~GeV}</math> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |<math>\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}=12.212^{\circ}</math><br> | ||
| + | <math>\mathrm{HMS~}E'=4.068\mathrm{~GeV}</math><br> | ||
| + | <math>\mathrm{HMS~}Q^2=0.810\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2</math><br> | ||
| + | ||<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}=10.395^{\circ}</math><br> | ||
| + | <math>\mathrm{SHMS~}E'=4.154\mathrm{~GeV}</math><br> | ||
| + | <math>\mathrm{SHMS~}Q^2=0.600\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2</math><br> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | colspan="2" | [[Image:2013-10-07-e-44-opt.png]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===2.2 GeV Optimization Results=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; border-collapse:collapse;" border="1" | ||
| − | ! colspan="2" | <math>E_{\mathrm{beam}}= | + | ! colspan="2" | <math>E_{\mathrm{beam}}=2.2\mathrm{~GeV}</math> |
|- | |- | ||
| − | |<math>\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}= | + | |<math>\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}=16.474^{\circ}</math><br> |
| − | <math>\mathrm{HMS~}E'= | + | <math>\mathrm{HMS~}E'=2.048\mathrm{~GeV}</math><br> |
| − | <math>\mathrm{HMS~}Q^2= | + | <math>\mathrm{HMS~}Q^2=0.370\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2</math><br> |
| − | ||<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}= | + | ||<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}=15.490^{\circ}</math><br> |
| − | <math>\mathrm{SHMS~}E'= | + | <math>\mathrm{SHMS~}E'=2.065\mathrm{~GeV}</math><br> |
| − | <math>\mathrm{SHMS~}Q^2=0. | + | <math>\mathrm{SHMS~}Q^2=0.330\mathrm{~(GeV/}c)^2</math><br> |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | colspan="2" | [[Image:2013-10-07-e- | + | | colspan="2" | [[Image:2013-10-07-e-44-opt.png]] |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 16:10, 7 October 2013
Azz Re-Optimization
Using the Bosted code, which now uses the complete cross-section with both QE and DIS parts, has been checked against previous data, and uses the full dilution factor, I've gone back through beam energies of 6.6, 4.4, and 2.2 GeV and optimized the physics rates while keeping the total rates below the DAQ maximum (without prescales) of 3kHz.
6.6 GeV Optimization Results
| <math>E_{\mathrm{beam}}=6.6\mathrm{~GeV}</math> | |
|---|---|
| <math>\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}=12.382^{\circ}</math> <math>\mathrm{HMS~}E'=5.862\mathrm{~GeV}</math> |
<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}=8.231^{\circ}</math> <math>\mathrm{SHMS~}E'=6.252\mathrm{~GeV}</math> |
| |
4.4 GeV Optimization Results
| <math>E_{\mathrm{beam}}=4.4\mathrm{~GeV}</math> | |
|---|---|
| <math>\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}=12.212^{\circ}</math> <math>\mathrm{HMS~}E'=4.068\mathrm{~GeV}</math> |
<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}=10.395^{\circ}</math> <math>\mathrm{SHMS~}E'=4.154\mathrm{~GeV}</math> |
| |
2.2 GeV Optimization Results
| <math>E_{\mathrm{beam}}=2.2\mathrm{~GeV}</math> | |
|---|---|
| <math>\mathrm{HMS~}\theta_{e'}=16.474^{\circ}</math> <math>\mathrm{HMS~}E'=2.048\mathrm{~GeV}</math> |
<math>\mathrm{SHMS~}\theta_{e'}=15.490^{\circ}</math> <math>\mathrm{SHMS~}E'=2.065\mathrm{~GeV}</math> |
|
| |
