Difference between revisions of "Elong-14-03-27"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | = | + | =ptrates.f Addition Check= |
− | + | {| style="float: right" border=1 | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
! D & N check !! All Cross-Sections | ! D & N check !! All Cross-Sections | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 12: | Line 8: | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | First thing, after a number of trouble-shooting steps (mainly making sure that all of the variables pass correctly to inclusive.f since I'm putting them in from ptrates.f instead of the normal input file), I was able to get Misak's code integrated into my rates code so that when you run either the cross sections come out the same. These are at E=6.6GeV, E'=6.07 GeV, theta=9.51deg, since those were the conditions I used previously to compare Bosted's code to Misak's. (Note: For the plots to the right, it's assuming ND3 target) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Once I made sure that the deuterium and nitrogen were working correctly, I added Misak's calculations for the other cross sections. | ||
This immediately brings to mind how previously the Bosted code was giving a smaller dilution factor than Misak's. Comparing the full Misak dilution (including N, He, & D) to Bosted's code looks like this: | This immediately brings to mind how previously the Bosted code was giving a smaller dilution factor than Misak's. Comparing the full Misak dilution (including N, He, & D) to Bosted's code looks like this: | ||
[[Image:2014-03-27-fdil-check.png|400px]] | [[Image:2014-03-27-fdil-check.png|400px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | =Rates with Misak's Cross Sections= |
Revision as of 12:54, 27 March 2014
ptrates.f Addition Check
D & N check | All Cross-Sections |
---|---|
First thing, after a number of trouble-shooting steps (mainly making sure that all of the variables pass correctly to inclusive.f since I'm putting them in from ptrates.f instead of the normal input file), I was able to get Misak's code integrated into my rates code so that when you run either the cross sections come out the same. These are at E=6.6GeV, E'=6.07 GeV, theta=9.51deg, since those were the conditions I used previously to compare Bosted's code to Misak's. (Note: For the plots to the right, it's assuming ND3 target)
Once I made sure that the deuterium and nitrogen were working correctly, I added Misak's calculations for the other cross sections.
This immediately brings to mind how previously the Bosted code was giving a smaller dilution factor than Misak's. Comparing the full Misak dilution (including N, He, & D) to Bosted's code looks like this: