Difference between revisions of "Elong-14-03-27"

From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
=Adding Misak's Code to Rates=
+
=ptrates.f Addition Check=
  
First thing, after a number of trouble-shooting steps (mainly making sure that all of the variables pass correctly to inclusive.f since I'm putting them in from ptrates.f instead of the normal input file), I was able to get Misak's code integrated into my rates code so that when you run either the cross sections come out the same. These are at E=6.6GeV, E'=6.07 GeV, theta=9.51deg, since those were the conditions I used previously to compare Bosted's code to Misak's. (Note: For the plots below, it's assuming ND3 target)
+
{| style="float: right" border=1
 
 
Once I made sure that the deuterium and nitrogen were working correctly, I added Misak's calculations for the other cross sections.
 
 
 
{|border=1
 
 
! D & N check !! All Cross-Sections
 
! D & N check !! All Cross-Sections
 
|-
 
|-
Line 12: Line 8:
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
First thing, after a number of trouble-shooting steps (mainly making sure that all of the variables pass correctly to inclusive.f since I'm putting them in from ptrates.f instead of the normal input file), I was able to get Misak's code integrated into my rates code so that when you run either the cross sections come out the same. These are at E=6.6GeV, E'=6.07 GeV, theta=9.51deg, since those were the conditions I used previously to compare Bosted's code to Misak's. (Note: For the plots to the right, it's assuming ND3 target)
 +
 +
Once I made sure that the deuterium and nitrogen were working correctly, I added Misak's calculations for the other cross sections.
  
 
This immediately brings to mind how previously the Bosted code was giving a smaller dilution factor than Misak's. Comparing the full Misak dilution (including N, He, & D) to Bosted's code looks like this:
 
This immediately brings to mind how previously the Bosted code was giving a smaller dilution factor than Misak's. Comparing the full Misak dilution (including N, He, & D) to Bosted's code looks like this:
  
 
[[Image:2014-03-27-fdil-check.png|400px]]
 
[[Image:2014-03-27-fdil-check.png|400px]]
 +
 +
=Rates with Misak's Cross Sections=

Revision as of 12:54, 27 March 2014

ptrates.f Addition Check

D & N check All Cross-Sections
2014-03-27-cs-check.png 2014-03-27-cs-check-all.png

First thing, after a number of trouble-shooting steps (mainly making sure that all of the variables pass correctly to inclusive.f since I'm putting them in from ptrates.f instead of the normal input file), I was able to get Misak's code integrated into my rates code so that when you run either the cross sections come out the same. These are at E=6.6GeV, E'=6.07 GeV, theta=9.51deg, since those were the conditions I used previously to compare Bosted's code to Misak's. (Note: For the plots to the right, it's assuming ND3 target)

Once I made sure that the deuterium and nitrogen were working correctly, I added Misak's calculations for the other cross sections.

This immediately brings to mind how previously the Bosted code was giving a smaller dilution factor than Misak's. Comparing the full Misak dilution (including N, He, & D) to Bosted's code looks like this:

2014-03-27-fdil-check.png

Rates with Misak's Cross Sections