Difference between revisions of "Elong-14-04-15"

From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
In a worst case scenario where we are stuck with Pzz=15% on an ND3 target, I looked into what single kinematics point we could spend all of our time on that would give us the best measurement. (Note: For each of these plots, the systematics were hard-wired to the specific kinematics we had listed for the proposal. <b>Don't trust the systematics.</b> The statistics are what's important.)
 
In a worst case scenario where we are stuck with Pzz=15% on an ND3 target, I looked into what single kinematics point we could spend all of our time on that would give us the best measurement. (Note: For each of these plots, the systematics were hard-wired to the specific kinematics we had listed for the proposal. <b>Don't trust the systematics.</b> The statistics are what's important.)
  
[http://nuclear.unh.edu/~elong/analysis_files/2014-04-15/ Individual frames for each of the plots below can be found here].
+
[http://nuclear.unh.edu/~elong/analysis_files/2014-04-15/ Individual frames for each of the plots below can be found here.]
  
 
First I did a Q^2 scan of the SHMS
 
First I did a Q^2 scan of the SHMS

Revision as of 10:28, 15 April 2014

Pzz=15% with ND3 Scenario

In a worst case scenario where we are stuck with Pzz=15% on an ND3 target, I looked into what single kinematics point we could spend all of our time on that would give us the best measurement. (Note: For each of these plots, the systematics were hard-wired to the specific kinematics we had listed for the proposal. Don't trust the systematics. The statistics are what's important.)

Individual frames for each of the plots below can be found here.

First I did a Q^2 scan of the SHMS

2014-04-15-shms-q2-scan.gif

This was followed by an x scan of the HMS

2014-04-15-hms-x-scan.gif

and an x scan of the SHMS.

2014-04-15-shms-x-scan.gif

After each of these, it looked like our best point was to put the central SHMS at x=0.28 and Q^2=1.47 with the HMS at x=0.41 and Q^2=3.33. If we do that, and are ok lowering our W^2, we can increase the statistics in the x=0.4 point by opening up the cut

2014-04-15-w2-cut-scan.gif