Difference between revisions of "Elong-13-09-18"
From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
===Beam Energy = 11.0 GeV=== | ===Beam Energy = 11.0 GeV=== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | + | (None for HMS -- rates drop off dramatically by the time it's in a good kinematics range) [[Image:2013-09-19-e110-opt-shms.png|600px]] | |
| − | |||
==Fixed uncertainty due to large asymmetry== | ==Fixed uncertainty due to large asymmetry== | ||
Revision as of 16:18, 19 September 2013
Optimizing Azz in QE and x>1 Range
Beam Energy = 2.2 GeV
HMS
SHMS
Beam Energy = 4.4 GeV
HMS
SHMS
Beam Energy = 6.6 GeV
HMS
SHMS
Beam Energy = 8.8 GeV
HMS
SHMS
Beam Energy = 11.0 GeV
HMS
SHMS
Optimization Results
Beam Energy = 2.2 GeV
Beam Energy = 4.4 GeV
Beam Energy = 6.6 GeV
Beam Energy = 8.8 GeV
Beam Energy = 11.0 GeV
(None for HMS -- rates drop off dramatically by the time it's in a good kinematics range) 
Fixed uncertainty due to large asymmetry
Previously, the code was using a simplified <math>\delta A_{zz} = \frac{4}{f \cdot Pzz \sqrt{N}}</math>. This gave all of the above uncertainties, as well as this one:
Going back through the uncertainty tech note, the assumption of a small asymmetry isn't made until after Eq. 28. Utilizing the full uncertainty (Eq. 28 and 25), <math>\delta A_{zz} = \frac{2}{f \cdot Pzz}\sqrt{\frac{N_{Pol}}{N_u^2}+\frac{N_{Pol}^2}{N_u^3}}</math>, the uncertainties change (very slightly) to:
--E. Long 21:13, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
