Difference between revisions of "Elong-14-02-04"

From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: ==G. Miller's New b1 Calculations== Reading through [http://arxiv.org/pdf/1311.4561.pdf G. Miller's paper that includes new calculations of b1 based on 6-quark, hidden color contributions...)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
[[Image:2014-02-04-gmiller_fig4.png|500px]]
 
[[Image:2014-02-04-gmiller_fig4.png|500px]]
 +
 +
 +
===Compared to Proposal===
  
 
If I just add these to the plots we had on our proposal, it looks like:
 
If I just add these to the plots we had on our proposal, it looks like:
Line 9: Line 12:
 
[[Image:2014-02-04-b16q_proposal.png]]
 
[[Image:2014-02-04-b16q_proposal.png]]
  
 +
 +
===W > 1.5===
 
It looked like if we could squeeze another point out around 0.65, then there might be a chance to further constrain the model. However, this would require dropping our W cut from 1.85 to 1.50. The result would be:
 
It looked like if we could squeeze another point out around 0.65, then there might be a chance to further constrain the model. However, this would require dropping our W cut from 1.85 to 1.50. The result would be:
  
 
[[Image:2014-02-04-b16q_w_15.png]]
 
[[Image:2014-02-04-b16q_w_15.png]]
 +
 +
 +
===Results===
  
 
Finally, there's a lot going on in all of these plots. It we make the proposal W cut for the first 4 points, but lower it to add the 5th point, our ability to differentiate between the curves looks like:
 
Finally, there's a lot going on in all of these plots. It we make the proposal W cut for the first 4 points, but lower it to add the 5th point, our ability to differentiate between the curves looks like:
  
[[Image:2014-02-04-b16q_clean.png]]
+
[[Image:2014-02-04-b16q_clean.png|500px]]
 +
 
 +
(Note that the projected points are still shown as if they're expected along the Kumano fit)

Revision as of 17:02, 4 February 2014

G. Miller's New b1 Calculations

Reading through G. Miller's paper that includes new calculations of b1 based on 6-quark, hidden color contributions, I thought I'd add his Fig. 4 plots to our proposal plot to see if we could potentially differentiate between the curves. It should be noted that this is only the 6-quark part, and doesn't include the 1-pion exchange. Because of this, these plots shouldn't be trusted below x~0.2.

2014-02-04-gmiller fig4.png


Compared to Proposal

If I just add these to the plots we had on our proposal, it looks like:

2014-02-04-b16q proposal.png


W > 1.5

It looked like if we could squeeze another point out around 0.65, then there might be a chance to further constrain the model. However, this would require dropping our W cut from 1.85 to 1.50. The result would be:

2014-02-04-b16q w 15.png


Results

Finally, there's a lot going on in all of these plots. It we make the proposal W cut for the first 4 points, but lower it to add the 5th point, our ability to differentiate between the curves looks like:

2014-02-04-b16q clean.png

(Note that the projected points are still shown as if they're expected along the Kumano fit)