|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | =Meeting Minutes=
| |
| | | | |
| − | ==2014-04-18 Proposal Meeting Minutes==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | *Ellie showed the [[Elong-14-04-04 | kinematics for 5 potential measurements in 24 PAC days]]
| |
| − | * For the PAC, it will be important not only to see what we can do with Pzz=30%, but also for Pzz=15%
| |
| − | * One thing that Doug and Patricia noted is that it probably makes more sense to really nail the plateau at Q^2~1.5, without question, and have that be our high-Q^2 point
| |
| − | :*The lower Q^2 points are cheap compared to the high one
| |
| − | ::*Ellie will play with the kinematics a bit to find our plateau sweet spot
| |
| − | :::*The x>2 region is going to be important for getting a handle on the dilution, even though it's unphysical for the deuteron
| |
| − | * Doug is going to talk to Brad Sawatzky about getting us a JLab git repository
| |
| − | * The PAC42 submission deadline is June 2
| |
| − | :* The joint Hall A/C meeting is on June 5-6, following the User's Group Meeting
| |
| − | ::* Ellie will contact Pete Markowitz about our intent to submit a proposal
| |
| − | * Putting together the proposal
| |
| − | :* We are ahead of the game on kinematics, but need theory motivation for the experiment
| |
| − | :* The talks from the Tensor Workshop need to be combed through for the interesting physics
| |
| − | ::* Karl and Ellie will go back through the talks to pull out interesting motivations
| |
| − | :::* Wally's talk will be useful for the low Q^2 points
| |
| − | :::* Misak's and Mark's talks will be useful for the high Q^2 point
| |
| − | * Doug, Karl, and Patricia are interested in moving forward, but we need to reach out to pick up more collaborators
| |
| − | * Next meeting in 1-2 weeks, depending on progress
| |
| − | ::* Fridays at 3:00pm is a good time for everyone
| |
