Elong-13-10-01
Cross Section Calculation
For previous calculations, I was using a simplified version of the cross-section where it was assumed that <math>F_2=2x\cdot F_1</math>, such that
<math>\frac{d^2\sigma^u}{d\Omega dE'} = A_X \left( \frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} \right) _{\mathrm{Mott}_{\mathrm{p}}} \left[ \frac{2\cdot \left(\frac{F_1^{X}}{A_X} \right)}{m_{p}}\right]\cdot \left[\tan^2\left( \frac{\theta_{e'}}{2} \right) + \frac{Q^2 }{2\nu^2} \right] </math>.
Since we're in a region that isn't DIS, I thought that the difference may be important so I incorporated <math>F_2</math> from Bosted and removed the assumption:
<math>\frac{d^2\sigma^u}{d\Omega dE'} = A_X \left( \frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} \right) _{\mathrm{Mott}_{\mathrm{p}}} \left[ \frac{2\cdot \left(\frac{F_1^{X}}{A_X} \right)}{m_{p}}\tan^2\left( \frac{\theta_{e'}}{2} \right) + \frac{\left( \frac{F_2^X}{A_X}\right) }{\nu} \right]</math>.
This increased the statistical uncertainty, particularly in the high-x region. It also lowered the rates dramatically, which gives us some room to play around with a lower <math>Q^2</math>.
Although this changes the cross sections quite a bit,
<math>F_1 \mathrm{~Only}</math> | <math>F_1\mathrm{~and~}F_2</math> |
---|---|
The dilution factor is nearly identical.
Cross Section Check for b1
To see if this could cause a problem for the b1 statistics, I did a study of the effects of changing the cross section calculation from the simplified to the full for the b1 kinematics.
Cross Section Check for Azz
Same as the section above, looking at the difference between the simplified cross section using only <math>F_1</math> and the full cross section using both <math>F_1</math> and <math>F_2</math>, but for the Azz kinematics.
HMS <math>\theta_{e'}=12.45^{\circ}</math> <math>E'=5.80\mathrm{~GeV}</math> |
SHMS <math>\theta_{e'}=9.51^{\circ}</math> <math>E'=6.07\mathrm{~GeV}</math> |
---|---|
--E. Long 21:20, 1 October 2013 (UTC)