Difference between revisions of "Pol He3 Target Meeting November 23, 2020"

From HallCWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "<b> Members present: Jian-ping, Arun, Bill, Murchhana, Mingyu, Melanie, Junhao, and Dave </b> Junhao *Working on deriving the target polarization per run. Need the following...")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Start time: 1:30 p.m.
 +
 +
End time: 2:59 p.m.
 +
 
<b> Members present: Jian-ping, Arun, Bill, Murchhana, Mingyu, Melanie, Junhao, and Dave </b>
 
<b> Members present: Jian-ping, Arun, Bill, Murchhana, Mingyu, Melanie, Junhao, and Dave </b>
 +
 +
Melanie
 +
*Almost completed d2n calibration cross-check
 +
*When the info becomes available, be sure to update results with the final AFP loss for each cell/configuration, and proper PC and TC temperature values derived from the temperature tests
 +
**Junhao and Mingyu should make and update an appropriate database for this
 +
*Identify and separate "problematic" EPR measurements to discuss as a group, and to investigate the suspected issue (like obtaining necessary EPICs values for field instability, for example)
  
 
Junhao
 
Junhao
Line 14: Line 24:
 
***special conditions: laser status, QWP status, etc
 
***special conditions: laser status, QWP status, etc
 
*AFP loss study done on longitudinal configuration with 6V convection heater; to get the true AFP loss, we need to also correct for the convection itself
 
*AFP loss study done on longitudinal configuration with 6V convection heater; to get the true AFP loss, we need to also correct for the convection itself
 +
 +
Bill
 +
*Presented Field Mapping measurements done in September 2020
 +
**11 and 14 degree settings weren’t done with everything on; only the 18 degree measurement was done with all the coils on, so is the only setting that can be compared to Murchhana's compass measurement
 +
**general trends are the same everywhere between both measurements
 +
**transverse and longitudinal orientations were equal to or less than 0.5 degree off from values found from the compass measurement
 +
**the takeaway is that we can trust the compass measurement results within 0.5 degrees; ideally would want to be within 0.1 degree confidence level

Latest revision as of 16:03, 23 November 2020

Start time: 1:30 p.m.

End time: 2:59 p.m.

Members present: Jian-ping, Arun, Bill, Murchhana, Mingyu, Melanie, Junhao, and Dave

Melanie

  • Almost completed d2n calibration cross-check
  • When the info becomes available, be sure to update results with the final AFP loss for each cell/configuration, and proper PC and TC temperature values derived from the temperature tests
    • Junhao and Mingyu should make and update an appropriate database for this
  • Identify and separate "problematic" EPR measurements to discuss as a group, and to investigate the suspected issue (like obtaining necessary EPICs values for field instability, for example)

Junhao

  • Working on deriving the target polarization per run. Need the following quantities:
    • NMR amplitude of last NMR measurement before the run
    • EPR correction based on the current field direction and magnets condition
    • Convection correction: target chamber polarization correction based on equilibrium condition
    • AFP loss on target chamber
    • pNMR loss on target chamber
    • polarization-evolution-based correction:
      • time: spin up time constant and observed polarization deterioration
      • charge: accumulated charge on target since the last NMR measurement
      • beam current
      • special conditions: laser status, QWP status, etc
  • AFP loss study done on longitudinal configuration with 6V convection heater; to get the true AFP loss, we need to also correct for the convection itself

Bill

  • Presented Field Mapping measurements done in September 2020
    • 11 and 14 degree settings weren’t done with everything on; only the 18 degree measurement was done with all the coils on, so is the only setting that can be compared to Murchhana's compass measurement
    • general trends are the same everywhere between both measurements
    • transverse and longitudinal orientations were equal to or less than 0.5 degree off from values found from the compass measurement
    • the takeaway is that we can trust the compass measurement results within 0.5 degrees; ideally would want to be within 0.1 degree confidence level