Difference between revisions of "SHMS Optics Working Group"
From HallCWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Weekly Meetings == | == Weekly Meetings == | ||
*Meetings will be held on Thursdays 11:30-12:30 in F228. | *Meetings will be held on Thursdays 11:30-12:30 in F228. | ||
− | * Next meeting March | + | * Next meeting March 31st. |
*Join by Bluejeans by phone and computer +1.888.240.2560 (US Toll Free) Enter Meeting ID: 653182486 | *Join by Bluejeans by phone and computer +1.888.240.2560 (US Toll Free) Enter Meeting ID: 653182486 | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Notes from March 10th meeting == | ||
+ | * Need to check whether the beam pipe will allow one to go to 8-9.5 degrees. (Dave Gaskell will look into this.) | ||
+ | * Get the Q1 mapping information from Steve Lassiter. | ||
+ | * Need to keep track of detector surveys. Contact Bert Metzger. | ||
+ | * Put code for setting field on wiki. | ||
+ | * Double check to understand why this is a 0.7% difference between field at +3900A and -3900A. | ||
+ | * Change the effective length of HB by 4% to see effects on the optics. Look at sieve. | ||
+ | * Need table for conversion of all magnet currents to momentum. | ||
+ | * Check with Steve Lassiter about what is exactly thinking of using to mitigate the HB stray fields. Wedges + C-section + iron pipe? | ||
+ | |||
== Preparation plans == | == Preparation plans == | ||
Line 12: | Line 23: | ||
** Double check that the magnet field between magnets are superpositions. | ** Double check that the magnet field between magnets are superpositions. | ||
** Survey of the positioning of magnets. | ** Survey of the positioning of magnets. | ||
− | * | + | * Carbon elastics at 2 pass. |
* Survey of collimators, detectors and beamline components. | * Survey of collimators, detectors and beamline components. | ||
* Survey of HMS/SHMS pointing at different angles. Look into what was done in the past for HMS commissioning. Determine a list of angles for survey. | * Survey of HMS/SHMS pointing at different angles. Look into what was done in the past for HMS commissioning. Determine a list of angles for survey. | ||
Line 18: | Line 29: | ||
* Need to look at use of ideal dipole versus TOSCA field map for HB in COSY. | * Need to look at use of ideal dipole versus TOSCA field map for HB in COSY. | ||
* Check with Howard about checking the quad field centering. | * Check with Howard about checking the quad field centering. | ||
− | * Integration of detector checkout and optics. | + | * Integration of detector checkout and optics. |
+ | |||
+ | == Carbon elastics == | ||
+ | * Results from Dipangkar for [[ Media:Mefcal_3panel.png |1 pass- 2.2 GeV]], and 2 pass -[[ Media:Diff_min.png |4.4 GeV]]). Measurements at 8-9.5 are doable. | ||
+ | * Need to check whether the beam pipe will allow one to go to 8-9.5 degrees. (Dave Gaskell will look into this.) | ||
== SHMS HB mapping == | == SHMS HB mapping == |
Revision as of 18:48, 10 March 2016
Weekly Meetings
- Meetings will be held on Thursdays 11:30-12:30 in F228.
- Next meeting March 31st.
- Join by Bluejeans by phone and computer +1.888.240.2560 (US Toll Free) Enter Meeting ID: 653182486
Notes from March 10th meeting
- Need to check whether the beam pipe will allow one to go to 8-9.5 degrees. (Dave Gaskell will look into this.)
- Get the Q1 mapping information from Steve Lassiter.
- Need to keep track of detector surveys. Contact Bert Metzger.
- Put code for setting field on wiki.
- Double check to understand why this is a 0.7% difference between field at +3900A and -3900A.
- Change the effective length of HB by 4% to see effects on the optics. Look at sieve.
- Need table for conversion of all magnet currents to momentum.
- Check with Steve Lassiter about what is exactly thinking of using to mitigate the HB stray fields. Wedges + C-section + iron pipe?
Preparation plans
- Magnets.
- Determination of B versus I curve. Develop new code for setting SHMS. Revise HMS field setting codes.
- Cycling procedure especially for HB. Look what is done for the HMS.
- Double check that the magnet field between magnets are superpositions.
- Survey of the positioning of magnets.
- Carbon elastics at 2 pass.
- Survey of collimators, detectors and beamline components.
- Survey of HMS/SHMS pointing at different angles. Look into what was done in the past for HMS commissioning. Determine a list of angles for survey.
- Need to come up with the sieve pattern as a function of quad settings.
- Need to look at use of ideal dipole versus TOSCA field map for HB in COSY.
- Check with Howard about checking the quad field centering.
- Integration of detector checkout and optics.
Carbon elastics
- Results from Dipangkar for 1 pass- 2.2 GeV, and 2 pass -4.4 GeV). Measurements at 8-9.5 are doable.
- Need to check whether the beam pipe will allow one to go to 8-9.5 degrees. (Dave Gaskell will look into this.)
SHMS HB mapping
- Document and plots about mapping of B versus I at center of HB bore and the fringe fields in the beam region.
- B/I versus I plot.
- Measurements of B at bore center versus I when ramping magnet from 0 to +3900 and back to 0. Then switch polarity and ramp from 0 to -3900 and back to zero.
- plot of absolute difference between B when ramping magnet up and down versus I when going to +3900 and -3900.
- plot of relative difference between B when ramping magnet up and down versus I when going to +3900 and -3900.
- Plot of difference in B between ramping up to +3900 and ramping up to -3900 versus current.
- When ramping to negative currents there was a trip at I= -3139A. Plot of difference between first ramp to -3139A and the second.
- Document and plots about mapping Of B versus z for five different x,y locations (center,top,bottomleft and right) for I = 2000, 3000, 3500 and 3900A.
SLITS and COLLIMATORS
SHMS Detector Positions
- Detector_Locations_in_SHMS location
SHMS Characteristics
SHMS Drawings of magnets
Study of the SHMS resolution
- Study of the SHMS resolution.
Old HMS information
- HMS Detector survey information,Magnet location surveys
- File with B/I data and plots for dipole and quads.
- Document about dipole field measurements.
- Dipole Transfer Function which compares Tosca and measurements at probe and center.
- Q1 Transfer Function plots and data
- Q2 Transfer Function plots and data
- Q3 Transfer Function plots and data
- Note by Dave Mack on dipole current regulation.
- Plot of Q2 predicted waist versus momentum for effects of zero offset.
- Plots of quads effective field length.
- Plots of quad fringe field.
- Plot X_fp versus momentum.
SNAKE
Moved Snake section here.